Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there a way to directly show maximal ideals are prime, avoiding the usual argument with quotient rings?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Let $M$ be a maximal ideal of the commutative ring $R$. Assume $ab \in M$, but $b \not\in M$. Then the ideal $M+(b)$ strictly contains $M$. Since $M$ is maximal, this implies that $M+(b)=R$. In particular, this implies that there exists some $m\in M$ and $r\in R$ such that $m+rb=1$. Multiplying through by $a$ gives $ma+rab=a$. Both $ma$ and $rab$ are in $M$, and so $a$ must in $M$. Thus $M$ is prime.

share|cite|improve this answer
wow, that was fast. Thanks, that's exactly the type of thing I was looking for. – James Vincent Dec 17 '12 at 7:20
Might clarify by saying $M +(b)$ strictly contains $M$, as $b \not \in M,$ but it is clear enough from the context. – Geoff Robinson Dec 17 '12 at 8:14
... and of course somehow this is just the quotient argument in disguise. – Hagen von Eitzen Dec 17 '12 at 8:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.