Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

While studying, I came across this question:

If $A$ is a ring in which $x^n=x$ for all $x\in A$ (where $n$ is an integer greater than $1$ and may depend on $x$), show all prime ideals are maximal.

I didn't find the solution too hard (if it is correct). We let $P$ be a prime ideal. That $A/P$ is an integral domain; if we can show it is also a field, we'll know that $P$ is maximal. To that end, we know $a^n+P=a+P$, and in particular, $(a+P)(a^{n-1}+P)=(a+P)(1+P)$. Since we're in an integral domain, the cancellation law applies, so we have $(a^{n-1}+P)=(1+P)$. Now we have $(a+P)(a^{n-2}+P)=(1+P)$, hence $(a+P)$ has an inverse, so $A/P$ is a field.

The next question has me confused, though:

Let $\mathbf{m}$ be a prime ideal in a ring in which $x^n=x$ for all $x\in A$ (where $n$ is an integer greater than $1$ and may depend on $x$). Show that $A_\mathbf{m}$ is a field.

It seems like $A_\mathbf{m}$ should not be a field since $\frac{m}{1}$, $m\in\mathbf{m}$ wouldn't have an inverse, thus it would have to be in the equivalence class of $\frac{0}{1}$, but I don't see why that is true (if it indeed is true). Please help clear this up for me!

share|improve this question
    
When you say «such a ring» in the second displayed piece of text, what do you mean? –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Dec 17 '12 at 3:48
    
A ring $A$ that has the property where $x^n=x$ for some positive integer greater than $1$ and may depend on $x$. The question has two parts; the first one wasn't too challenging, but I don't see why the second question is true. –  Clayton Dec 17 '12 at 3:49
    
If you edit the question to be explicit, we can delete these comments :-) –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Dec 17 '12 at 3:50
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Let $x\in \mathfrak{m}$ and let $n$ be such that $x^n=x$. Then $x^{n-1}-1$ is not in $\mathfrak{m}$ because this would imply that $1\in\mathfrak{m}$ which is imposible since $\mathfrak{m}$ is a prime ideal. But $(x^{n-1}-1)x=0$ and this implies that $x/1=0$ by definition of $A_\mathfrak{m}$.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 Very nice, short and elegant. –  DonAntonio Dec 17 '12 at 3:58
    
It makes perfect sense! Thank you @Diego. –  Clayton Dec 17 '12 at 4:06
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.