Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$f: [a. \infty ) \rightarrow \mathbb R$ is differentiable and $\int_a^\infty f(t)dt $ and $\int_a^\infty f^{\prime}(t)dt $ are convergent then $f(t) \rightarrow 0$ as $t \rightarrow \infty$

my answer :

  1. $\int_a^x f^{\prime}(t)dt =f(x) - f(a)$

  2. $\int_a^\infty f^{\prime}(t)dt $ is convergent $\implies$ $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} f(x) = l $(where $l$ is finite ).to show $l=0$.

if $l \neq 0 \implies \exists <x_n> \rightarrow \infty $ such that $f(x_n) \geq \epsilon$ or $f(x_n) \leq \epsilon$ if i suppose $f(x_n) \geq \epsilon$ then as $f(x)$ is continuous then $f(x) \geq \frac{\epsilon}{2} \forall x \in(x_n-\delta,x_n+\delta)$ $\implies $ $\int_{x_n-\delta}^{x_n +\delta} f(t)dt \geq \epsilon\delta$ which will contradict the convergence of $\int_a^\infty f(t)dt $

share|cite|improve this question
The last part of your argument needs more rigor (what is $\epsilon$? What is $\delta$?) and is a bit off. You could argue more simply here: If $l\ne0$, then there exists an $\epsilon>0$ and an $x_0$ such that either $f(x)>\epsilon$ for all $x>x_0$ or $f(x)<-\epsilon$ for all $x>x_0$. Then use this to show that $f$ is not improperly integrable on $[a,\infty)$. – David Mitra Dec 16 '12 at 14:34
I should also point out that, in the last part of your proof, you don't need the fact that $f$ is continuous; all you need is the already proven fact that $\lim\limits_{x\rightarrow\infty}f(x)=l$. – David Mitra Dec 16 '12 at 14:43
up vote 1 down vote accepted

You already know that $$ l:=\lim_{x \to \infty}f(x) $$ is finite because $$ f(x)=f(a)+\int_a^xf'(t)\,dt\ \text{ and }\ \int_a^\infty f'(t)\,dt \ \text{ converges }. $$ In particular you can see that $$ l=f(a)+\int_a^\infty f'(t)\,dt. $$ If you want to prove by contradiction that $l \ne 0$, you may w.l.o.g. assume that $l>0$.

Then there is an $r >0$ such that $$ |f(t)-l| \le \frac12l \quad \forall t \ge r, $$ i.e. $$ \frac12l \le f(t) \le \frac32l \quad \forall\ t \ge r, $$ and so we have $$ \int_a^\infty f(t)\,dt=\int_a^rf(t)\,dt+\int_r^\infty f(t)\,dt=\infty, $$ which is a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.