Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When Andrew Wiles proved Fermat's Last Theorem, he built upon ideas from elliptic curves which already existed. Is there an example of a conjecture/theorem which was proved using an unexpected argument?

share|improve this question
5  
Related MO question: mathoverflow.net/questions/48771/… –  Alex J Best Dec 17 '12 at 0:46

9 Answers 9

up vote 16 down vote accepted

Does Euler's solution of the Seven Bridges of Königsberg problem (considered by some the first theorem of graph theory) count?

share|improve this answer
    
I think so, thank you! –  Daniel Littlewood Dec 16 '12 at 13:18

From Morris Kline's Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times, Vol III, pg. 970:

In the paper containing George Cantor's final answer to the question of whether a function can have two different trigonometric series representations in the interval $[-\pi,\pi]$, Cantor "laid the foundation of the theory of point sets".

share|improve this answer

The Four Color Theorem. Who ever back then thought that we might use a computer to help us proving something...

share|improve this answer

The premise of this question is dubious, insofar as it suggests that Wiles's work was less grounded in "entirely new idea[s]" than other major breakthroughs.

While some parts of the argument involved technical improvements on already known results, Wiles's argument (partly joint with Richard Taylor) also had many brilliantly new ideas in it (not surprisingly, since it solved the most well-known open problem in mathematics at the time), including an amazing criterion in commutative algebra for deducing that a homomorphism of rings is an isomorphism, and strikingly original arguments in the deformation theory of Galois representations.

Just to editorialize a little more: I think it's generally a mistake to think in terms of arguments being "entirely new" or representing a complete break from what went before. In my experience, it's generally more profitable to explore the connections between important new mathematics and the mathematics that has come before. Generally, there are many threads connecting the old and the new, and analyzing the pattern that they form can be inspiring and illuminating.

share|improve this answer

Galois created groups and much more to attack and solve the problem of which polynomial equations are solvable by radicals.

share|improve this answer
    
That's a great example... –  draks ... Dec 20 '12 at 19:14

Cohen's proofs of the independence of the Axiom of Choice and the Continuum Hypothesis required the introduction of the notion of a generic set.

share|improve this answer

Shelah's proof of the Whitehead problem and it independence. Until that point independence problems were considered as purely set-theoretical; but Shelah showed that this is not the case.

share|improve this answer

Fisk's short proof of Chvátal's art gallery theorem unexpectedly introduced graph coloring in a visibility problem in computational geometry.

share|improve this answer

This might warrant review Resolution of the Poincaré Conjecture.

You might also look at the Research Awards of the Clay Mathematics Institute.

Regards -A

share|improve this answer
    
Great links, great question! Can be inspiring to know... –  amWhy May 13 '13 at 0:33
    
It would be nice to find a permanent place on math.se to keep it and update it! I think many users can/could/would relate! –  amWhy May 13 '13 at 0:43

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.