Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given a system of nonlinear differential equation \begin{eqnarray}\frac{dx}{dt}=2x(3-y) \\ \frac{dy}{dt}=3y(4-x)\end{eqnarray} If $r(t)=$($x(t)$,$y(t)$) is a solution of the system with initial value $x(0)>0$ and $y(0)>0$, would you help me to prove that $x(t)>0$ and $y(t)>0$ for all real $t$.

Here is my argument: I prove it by contradiction. Let $r_1(t)=(x_1(t),x_2(t))$ be an orbit of the ODE with $x_1(0)=0$. Since, for $x=0$ we get $\frac{dx}{dt}=0$ then $x_1(t)=x_1(0)=0$. Thus, $x=0$ is an invariant manifold of the ODE. By the same argument, $y=0$ is also an invariant manifold. So the orbit that passing through a point in $x=0$ (resp $y=0$) always lies in $x=0$ (resp $y=0$). Assume there is a $t_1$ such that $x(t_1) \leq 0$ then $r(t)$ must intersect an orbit in $x=0 $( or $y=0$) hence $r(t)$ must lies on $x=0 $ (or $y=0$), contradicting $x(0)>0$ and $y(0)>0$.

Is there any a direct proof (or even elementary/simple proof)?

share|cite|improve this question

It is not quite clear what exactly you mean by "direct proof", but the main idea is very simple: the boundaries of $\mathbf R^2_+$ consist of orbits and due to the uniqueness and existence theorem the orbits cannot cross, which means that there is no way to cross a boundary.

share|cite|improve this answer
Note that our idea is similar right, assume there is a negative x or y then the orbit intersect invariant manifold which contain different orbit. I mean direct proof is using inequality start from $x(0)>0$ and $y(0)>0$ then by invariant manfold information and some analytic process to conclude $x(t)>0$ and $y(t)>0$ – beginner Dec 16 '12 at 22:43
@beginner Yes, of course, your idea is right. What I mean is the following: It seems to me that you overcomplicate the problem, the reasoning along the line: orbits do not cross and the boundary is composed of orbits together imply the solution will stay positive. This last sentence is a proof for me and does not require any additional arguments. – Artem Dec 16 '12 at 23:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.