Is there a proof of dirichlets theorem that does not require complex analysis?
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.
Here's how it works:
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
The proof given in A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory by Ireland and Rosen doesn't use anything you wouldn't learn outside of say a basic calculus course.