Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Prove that if $f$ is Riemann integrable on $[a,b]$ and $0<\rho \le f(x)$ for all $x \in [a,b]$ then $1/f$ is Riemann integrable on $[a,b]$.

share|cite|improve this question
Hint, use $|\frac{1}{f(x)}-\frac{1}{f(y)}|\leq \frac{|f(x)-f(y)|}{\rho^2}$ to estimate the Riemann sums. – ougao Dec 13 '12 at 14:22

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let $\epsilon>0$. Since $f$ is integrable, by the Riemann Criterion, there exists partition $$\mathcal{P}=\left\{ a=x_0<x_1<...<x_{n-1}<x_n=b \right\}$$ such as that \begin{equation}U_{f,\mathcal{P}}-L_{f,\mathcal{P}}<\epsilon\rho^2\end{equation} Therefore, for arbitrary $x,y\in [x_{i-1},x_i]$, \begin{equation}\left|\frac{1}{f(x)}-\frac{1}{f(y)}\right|=\frac{\left|f(x)-f(y)\right|}{\left|f(x)f(y)\right|}\le\frac{\left|f(x)-f(y)\right|}{\rho^2}\le \frac{M_i(f)-m_i(f)}{\rho^2}\end{equation} Taking the supremum and infimum as $x,y\in [x_{i-1},x_i]$ yields, \begin{gather} M_i\left(\frac{1}{f}\right)-m_i\left(\frac{1}{f}\right)\le \frac{M_i(f)-m_i(f)}{\rho^2}\Rightarrow\\ U_{\frac{1}{f},\mathcal{P}}-L_{\frac{1}{f},\mathcal{P}}\le \frac{1}{\rho^2}(U_{f,\mathcal{P}}-L_{f,\mathcal{P}})<\frac{1}{\rho^2}\rho^2\epsilon=\epsilon\end{gather} Therefore $\frac{1}{f}$ is integrable by the Riemann Criterion

share|cite|improve this answer

As usual you can get a quick proof using the (Riemann-)Lebesgue criterion: a function $f: [a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is Riemann integrable iff it is bounded and its set of discontinuities has measure zero. Here:

1) Since $0 < \rho \leq f(x)$ for all $x$, $0 \leq \frac{1}{f(x)} \leq \frac{1}{\rho}$ for all $x$: $\frac{1}{f}$ is bounded.

2) Since $f$ is nowhere zero, $\frac{1}{f}$ is continuous at exactly the same points as $x$. Since $f$ is assumed Riemann integrable, this common set of discontinuities has measure zero.

I should say that I like the other answer better -- it is more elementary and arguably more instructive. But I think it is nice to see this answer as an alternative.

share|cite|improve this answer
Agree with you…we do not actually now which of the equivalent definitions the OP is working with. – Henrik Dec 13 '12 at 15:09

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.