Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider $P_1$ and $P_2$ as two prob measures on $(R,B)$. Does knowing that $P_1([a,\infty)) \ge P_2([a,\infty)) \forall a \in R$ mean that for any open set in R (call it A), $P_1(A) \ge P_2(A)$ ?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Consider what happens if $P_1$ is a point mass at 2 and $P_2$ is a point mass at 0. Think about $A = (-1,1)$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

If $P_{1}=P_{2}$, then what you wish to prove follows trivially.

If $P_{1} \neq P_{2}$, then there exists $a$ such that $P_{1}([a,\infty)) > P_{2}([a,\infty))$. Take the open set $A = (-\infty,a)$.

$P_{1}(A) = 1-P_{1}([a,\infty)) < 1-P_{2}([a,\infty)) = P_{2}(A)$

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks madprob. Very helpful –  Eli Dec 12 '12 at 20:45
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.