Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know that $\mathcal{C}^k$ for $k\geq 1$ is dense in the space of Lipschitz funcions. My question in fact is: If $\{f_n\}_{n\geq 0}\subset \mathcal{C}^k$ such that $f_n \to f$ where $f$ is only Lipschitz. If such sequence $\{f_n\}_{n\geq 0}$ can be found in such a way that all derivatives are bounded and $\sup_n \|f_n^{(k)}\|_{\infty}<\infty$. So that I can upperbound "things" by the derivatives, and still get convergence when I let $n$ go to infinity.

Thanks a lot for your help! :)

share|cite|improve this question
If $(f_n^{(k)})_n$ is bounded, by Arzela-Ascoli, $(f_n^{(k-1)})_n$ has a locally uniform convergent subsequence, so $f$ is $C^{k-1}$. – martini Dec 12 '12 at 10:06
Does this then mean that I can not approximate an $f$ which is only Lipschitz by $f_n$ with bounded derivatives? mm.. what about $f(x)=|x|$? I can approximate it by $f_n\in \mathcal{C}^2$ with $f_n'$ bounded but then $f_n''$ is not bounded? Do I understand it correctly? Thank you very much for your help! – Daniel Dec 12 '12 at 10:37
You can approximate an Lipschitz $f$ with functions having bounded first derivatives, as the above argument gives a $C^0$-convergent subsequence, no problem. But the second derivatives cannot be bounded. – martini Dec 12 '12 at 13:19

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.