Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I have a self-adjoint operator which operates on twice differentiable functions defined by: $$ Lx(t) = [k(t)x'(t)]' + g(t)x(t) $$ How can I show that $k(t)$ is real-valued given that $k \in C^1[a,b]$ and $g \in C[a,b]$? Not really sure where to begin other than using the self-adjoint condition; that is, $(Lu,v) = (u,Lv)$ where $u,v$ are twice differentiable functions and $$ (u,v) = \int_a^b u(t) \overline{v(t)} \, dt $$ Any ideas to help me out?

share|cite|improve this question

As Stuart duly pointed out boundary conditions are essential here. Write out the scalar product explicitly and integrate by parts twice $$\left(Lx,y\right)=\int_{a}^{b}\left(kx'\right)'\bar{y}dt+\int_{a}^{b}gx\bar{y}dt=\left.kx'\bar{y}\right|_{a}^{b}-\int_{a}^{b}kx'\bar{y}'dt+\int_{a}^{b}gx\bar{y}dt=\\\left.\left(kx'\bar{y}-kx\bar{y}'\right)\right|_{a}^{b}+\int_{a}^{b}x\left(k\bar{y}'\right)'dt+\int_{a}^{b}xg\bar{y}dt$$ For what follows it is necessary that the first term in the last expression vanishes. Now $$\left(x,Ly\right)=\int_{a}^{b}x\left(\bar{k}\bar{y}'\right)'dt+\int_{a}^{b}x\bar{g}\bar{y}dt$$ Since the difference $\left(Lx,y\right)-\left(x,Ly\right)$ vanishes identically for all admissible $x$ and $y$ one may deduce the desired result.

share|cite|improve this answer

You're right, you can just use self-adjointness. Keep in mind that self-adjointness is more than just defining the operator, you need to define boundary conditions too. E.g. $u(a) = u(b) = 0$.

From self-adjointness, you get $k\bar{v}'' + k'\bar{v}' + g\bar{v} = \overline{kv'' + k'v' + gv}$. So $g$ is real too.

In general, if $L$ is self-adjoint and $L = p_0 u^{(n)} + p_1u^{(n-1)} + \cdots + p_nu$, then $L^* = (-1)^n (\overline{p_0}u)^{(n)} + (-1)^{n-1}(\overline{p_{1}}u)^{(n-1)} + \cdots + \overline {p_n}u$, where boundary conditions are such that $u(b)v(b) - u(a)v(a) = 0$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.