Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I need some light in this exercise:

"If $f:\mathbb {R^n}\rightarrow \mathbb {R^n}$ is continuous differentiable and the image of $f(\mathbb {R^n})$ has $\text{int} =\varnothing$ then the determinant of the Jacobian matrix is zero."

I really don't know where to start... I appreciate any help that helps me to get started.

share|cite|improve this question
I haven't done this in ages, but it seems obviously true: I suggest check definition of the jacobian as a limit. With the interior of the image empty, the only points converging to a a point $x_0$ will be $x_0$ themselves, so the derviative will be zero. – gnometorule Dec 11 '12 at 16:26
up vote 9 down vote accepted

If the determinant of the Jacobian was non-zero at some point, then the inverse function theorem would show that it is locally invertible, and hence maps a small open set into an open set, which would contradict the image having empty interior.

share|cite|improve this answer

Suppose there is a point $x$ such that $\operatorname{det}(f'(x))\neq 0$. What happens if you use the inverse function theorem?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.