Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was thinking about the following problem :

Define $ f:\mathbb C\rightarrow \mathbb C$ by

$$f(z)=\begin{cases}0 & \text{if } Re(z)=0\text{ or }Im(z)=0\\z & \text{otherwise}.\end{cases}$$

Then the set of points where $f$ is analytic is:

(a) $\{z:Re(z)\neq 0$ and $Im(z)\neq 0\}$,
(b) $\{z:Re(z)\neq 0$ or $Im(z)\neq 0\}$,
(c) $\{z:Re(z)\neq 0\}$,
(d) $\{z:Im(z)\neq 0\}$.

I think $f(z)=z$ if $f$ is defined on the set $\{z:Re(z)\neq 0$ and $Im(z)\neq 0\}$ and in that case $f$ is analytic. But I am not sure about the other options. So, choice (a) is right. Am I going in the right direction? Please help. Thanks in advance for your time.

share|cite|improve this question

It is not even continuous elsewhere except at $z=0$. At $z=0$, taking derivatives along the axis and along the diagonal produces different results.

share|cite|improve this answer

(a) is correct.

For $(a,0)\in\mathbb C$ with $a\neq0, u_x=0\neq 1=v_y$ at $(a,0)$ and for $(0,a)\in\mathbb C$ with $a\neq0, u_y=1\neq 0=v_y$ at $(a,0)$. Further $f$ is not differentiable at $(0,0)$.

Since $C-R$ equation doesn't get satisfied anywhere in the real and imaginary axis (minus origin) it's not differentiable there. As a result $(f$ is not differentiable at $0),$ $f$ is differentiable nowhere on the abscissa or the ordinate.

$f$ being the identity map elsewhere, is analytic thereon.

Now consider the sets indicated in all $4$ options.

share|cite|improve this answer
solution ta bujhlamna as $(a,0)$ te to function ta basically $0$ so all partial derivatives $0$ taina? – Un Chien Andalou May 4 '13 at 1:50
Sorry I was wrong. Corrected. BTW not all the pd's are zero ... as you see: $v_y(a,0)$$=\lim_{h\to 0}\dfrac{v(a,h)-v(a,0)}{h}$$=\lim_{h\to 0}\dfrac{h-0}{h}$$=1.$ – Sugata Adhya May 4 '13 at 2:36

I take $f(z)=u+iv$ and $z=x+iy$ where $x= \Re(z), y=\Im(z).$ In case ,$\Re(z), \Im(z) \ne 0$, then we can take $f(z)=z$ so that $$u+iv=x+iy$$ and so $$u=x,\,\,v=y$$. Whence $u_x=1=v_y,\,\, u_y=0=-v_x$. So, C-R equations are satisfied and hence option (a) is correct.

But if we take $f(z)=iy ,y \ne 0\,\,$ or of the form $f(z)=x,\,x \ne 0\, $ then C-R equations are not satisfied and hence other options can be eliminated.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.