Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I showed the following inequality to a colleague, where $A$ and the $B_i$ are all events: $$ \Pr\left(A \mid \bigwedge_{i = 1}^n \overline{B_i} \right) \leq \Pr(A) $$ He summarized, "So $A$ is negatively correlated with the $B_i$."

I have never heard this phrase used to refer to events. Even when it is used with respect to random variables, I'm not sure it is quite the same thing.

Could a more experience probabilist chime in? Does his terminology make sense? Is there a better word?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Does his terminology make sense?

It does: events $A$ and $B$ are negatively correlated if and only if $\mathbb P(A\cap B)\leqslant\mathbb P(A)\mathbb P(B)$, random variables $X$ and $Y$ are negatively correlated if and only if $\mathbb E(XY)\leqslant\mathbb E(X)\mathbb E(Y)$.

share|improve this answer
    
As surely your colleague would have told you on the spot if only you had asked them. –  Did Dec 11 '12 at 7:12
    
I just wanted a second opinion. Thanks. –  Austin Mohr Dec 11 '12 at 9:47
    
I just noticed that I slightly mistyped the inequality by neglecting the complementation. Your answer is still good, but my colleague probably should have said that $A$ is negatively correlated with the complement of the $B_i$s. –  Austin Mohr Dec 21 '12 at 18:50
    
It's worth pointing out that correlation of events is a special case of correlation of variables: just take the indicator functions of the events. –  Chris Eagle Dec 21 '12 at 18:52
    
AustinMohr: You should have left the question as it was, the modification only adds confusion. –  Did Dec 21 '12 at 21:44

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.