Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Čech-Stone compactification of the real line (with discrete topology) $\beta{\mathbb{R}}$ is not countable. I want to investigate to some properties of $\beta{\mathbb{R}}$ and the remainder $\beta{\mathbb{R}}\setminus\mathbb{R}$. I think the remainder is not Lindelöf. How can I proof this? And what about the metrizability of $\beta{\mathbb{R}}$?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

$\newcommand{\cl}{\operatorname{cl}}\beta\Bbb R$ is not even first countable, let alone metrizable: $\cl_{\beta\Bbb R}\Bbb Z$ is homeomorphic to $\beta\Bbb N$, and $\beta\Bbb N$ contains no convergent sequences. Corollary 3.7 in this paper by Henriksen and Isbell shows that $\beta\Bbb R\setminus\Bbb R$ is Lindelöf. Both of these statements hold both for the usual topology on $\Bbb R$ and for the discrete topology on $\Bbb R$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Interesting. Uncountable set with the discrete topology is Lindelöf... – Asaf Karagila Dec 11 '12 at 7:51
@Asaf: No, the Čech-Stone remainder of an uncountable discrete space is Lindelöf, because every discrete space is metrizable. – Brian M. Scott Dec 11 '12 at 7:54
I see. That makes much more sense! – Asaf Karagila Dec 11 '12 at 7:56
Thanks so much Prof. Scott. It was very useful for me. – ege Dec 11 '12 at 9:14
@ege: Glad to hear it; you’re very welcome. – Brian M. Scott Dec 11 '12 at 9:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.