Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The residue theorem that states that if

a) $U$ is a simply connected and open subset of the complex plane,

b) $a_1,\dots,a_n$ are finitely many points of $U$,

c) and $f$ is a function which is defined and holomorphic on $U\backslash \{a_1,\dots,a_n \}$,

d) $\gamma$ is a rectifiable and positively oriented curve in $U$ which does not meet any of the $a_k$, and whose start point equals its end point,

then $$ \oint_\gamma f(z)\, dz = 2\pi i \sum_{k=1}^n \operatorname{Res}( f, a_k ). $$ Question: What is the intuitive explanation of this theorem ?

I appreciate a explanation like geometry ( whit Java Applet ? ). But algebric explanation are welcome. I know the proof of this theorem, I'm just trying to understand the intuition ( if exists ) this theorem.

I'm motivated to get an intuition of this theorem because he gave a wonderful explanation of the intuitive of an part of fundamental theorem of calculus using the properties of the telescopic sums, mean value theorem and Riemann sum whit partition $\{a=x_0<x_1<\dots<x_n=b \}$ of interval: \begin{align} F(b)-F(a)= & \sum_{k=1}^{n}[F(x_k)-F(x_{k-1})] & \mbox{ telescopic sum } \\ = & \sum_{k=1}^{n}F^\prime(x_k^*)[x_k-x_{k-1}] & \mbox{Mean Value Theorem} \\ = & \sum_{k=1}^{n}F^\prime(x_k^*)\Delta x_k & \mbox{Riemann sum} \\ \approx & \int_{a}^{b}F^\prime(x)\, dx & \end{align}

It makes me think that there may be an explanation as elegant as this (but not necessarily following the same reasoning) in understanding the theorem of residues.

share|cite|improve this question
See also…. – lhf Dec 11 '12 at 0:07
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The algebraic intuitive explanation is that for all $n\in \mathbb Z$, the functions $z^n$ integrate to $0$ around a simple closed loop containing $z=0$, except when $n=-1$, when the integral is $2\pi i$.

From this observation it follows that if $f$ is a meromorphic function with one simple singularity at $z=a$ then $f(z)=g(z)/(z-a)$ where $g$ is holomorphic and when you expand $f$ in a Laurent series around $z=a$ (by using the Taylor series of $g$) you get one term $g(a)/(z-a)$ plus other terms that do not contain $z-a$ to a negative power, that is, a power series around $z=a$. When you integrate $f$ in that form, all terms but one become zero. The one that is left (hence the name residue) is the one corresponding to $g(a)/(z-a)$, whose integral is $2\pi i g(a)$. This is the Residue Theorem. It needs to be extended to handle higher-order singularities and multiple singularities but the essential idea is the one above.

share|cite|improve this answer
You may also enjoy Needham's Visual Complex Analysis. – lhf Dec 11 '12 at 0:06

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.