Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Trying to figure out how to solve problems on the 'form':

Find a real number $z$ and a square integrable, adapted process $\psi(s,w)$ such that

$$G(w) = z + \int \psi(s,w)\,dB_s(w)$$

for som process $G(w)$.

In the case I'm working on now I have $G(w) = (B^2_T(w)-T)\exp(B_T(w)-T)$.

So using the Martingale representation theorem I have that:

$$G(w) = E[G] + \int \psi(s,w)\,dB_s(w)$$

and I've already calculated $E[G]$ to be $T^2e^{-T/2}$. So it only remains to show what $\psi(s,w)$ is.

What I've done now is to apply the Itô formula on $G$, as he's done in other old exams, but I can't really understand what he's doing because his handwriting is terrible. But as I said he uses the Itô formula and uses the '$dB_s$'-term as the $\psi(s,w)$ but he's changing it and that step I can't really tell what he is doing. Does anyone know?

From the Itô formula I get $dG(w) = (B_s^2 + 2B_s - 2s)e^{B_s-s}dB_s(w) + (\ldots)dt$

Thanks in advance!

share|cite|improve this question
Are you sure that there is no typo in your definition of $G_T$...? (If there exists such a representation of $G$, then $(G_T)_T$ has to be a martingale, in particular $\mathbb{E}G_T$ should not depend on $T$.) – saz Dec 10 '12 at 13:02
Sorry, now that you mentioned it I see that I forgot the '-T's. This should be correct now – Good guy Mike Dec 10 '12 at 13:06
'in particular $E[G_T]$ should not depend on T', yes this made me very confused aswell, but this is as he has solved it (… problem 5). I can't quite tell what he's done for the other part as I said though. But I guess it's for fixed T, I mean G is just a function of $\omega$. – Good guy Mike Dec 10 '12 at 13:32
Are you really sure about it? As far as I can see the "ds"-term does not disappear in this case... – saz Dec 10 '12 at 13:34
The ds-term here: $dG(w) = (B_s^2 + 2B_s - 2s)e^{B_s-s}dB_s(w) + (\ldots)ds$? – Good guy Mike Dec 10 '12 at 13:44

First note that $G=X_TY_T\mathrm e^{-T/2}$ where the processes $X$ and $Y$ are defined for every $t\geqslant0$ by $$X_t=B_t^2-t,\qquad Y_t=\mathrm e^{B_t-t/2}. $$ The identity $M^T_t=E[X_TY_T\mid\mathcal F_t]$ defines a martingale $(M^T_t)_{0\leqslant t\leqslant T}$ such that $M^T_T=X_TY_T$ and $M^T_0=E[X_TY_T]$. Thus, $\mathrm dM^T_t=K^T_t\mathrm dB_t$ for some process $(K^T_t)_{0\leqslant t\leqslant T}$, and $$G=\mathrm e^{-T/2}M^T_0+\mathrm e^{-T/2}\int_0^TK^T_t\mathrm dB_t. $$ To sum up, this warm up paragraph shows that it suffices to identify $M_0^T$ and the process $K^T$.

You already know that $M_0^T=T^2\mathrm e^{-T/2}$. To identify $K^T$, fix some $t\lt T$, define $u=T-t$, and consider the processes $\bar B$, $\bar X$ and $\bar Y$ defined for every $s\geqslant0$ by $$\bar B_s=B_{t+s}-B_t,\qquad\bar X_s=\bar B_s^2-s,\qquad\bar Y_s=\mathrm e^{\bar B_s-s/2}. $$ Then, $$ X_TY_T=((B_t+\bar B_u)^2-t-u)Y_t\bar Y_u=X_tY_t\bar Y_u+2B_tY_t\bar B_u\bar Y_u+Y_t\bar B_u^2\bar Y_u. $$ Since $\bar B$ is independent of $\mathcal F_t$ and $(\bar B,\bar Y)$ is distributed like $(B,Y)$, this yields $$ M_t^T=E[X_TY_T\mid\mathcal F_t]=A_0(T-t)X_tY_t+2A_1(T-t)B_tY_t+A_2(T-t)Y_t, $$ where, for every integer $k\geqslant0$, $$ A_k(u)=E[B_u^kY_u]. $$ Since one already knows that $M^T$ is a martingale, one is only interested in the martingale part of the RHS of the last identity above giving $M_t^T$. Note that $\mathrm dX=2B\mathrm dB$ and $\mathrm dY=Y\mathrm dB$, hence the martingale part of $\mathrm d(BY)$ is $Y(B+1)\mathrm dB$ and the martingale part of $\mathrm d(XY)$ is $Y(X+2B)\mathrm dB$.

To compute the functions $A_k$ for $0\leqslant k\leqslant2$, note that, for every $x$, the identity $$ Y^x_u=\exp((1+x)B_u-(1+x)^2u/2)=Y_u\exp(xB_u-xu-x^2u/2), $$ defines a martingale $Y^x$ such that $Y^x_0=1$ hence $E[Y^x_u]=1$ for every $u\geqslant0$. Expanding this in powers of $x$ yields $$ E[Y_u]=1,\quad E[(B_u-u)Y_u]=0,\quad E[((B_u-u)^2-u)Y_u]=0, $$ that is, $$ A_0(u)=1,\quad A_1(u)=uA_0(u)=u,\quad A_2(u)=2uA_1(u)-(u^2-u)A_0(u)=u^2+u. $$ Finally, for every $0\leqslant t\leqslant T$, $$ K_t^T=(B_t^2-t+2(T-t+1)B_t+(T-t)^2+3(T-t))\cdot\mathrm e^{B_t-t/2}. $$

share|cite|improve this answer

As far as I can see it's wrong what he is doing there. The claim is that

$$2 \int_0^T B_t \cdot \exp \left( B_t-\frac{t}{2} \right) \, dt = T^2$$

But this can't be true. Since $t \mapsto B_t(w) \cdot \exp \left( B_t-\frac{t}{2} \right)(w)$ is continuous almost surely we can apply the fundamental theorem of calculus and obtain

$$2 B_T \cdot \exp \left(B_T- \frac{T}{2} \right) = 2 T \quad \text{a.s.}$$

which would imply

$$B_T = T \cdot \exp \left(\frac{T}{2}-B_T\right) \geq 0$$

... and this is not correct.

I applied Itô's formula to $f(t,x) := (x^2-t) \cdot \exp (x-t)$ and obtained

$$\underbrace{f(t,B_t)}_{G_t}-\underbrace{f(0,0)}_{0}= \int_0^t \exp(B_s-s) \cdot (B_s^2+2B_s-s) \, dB_s \\ + \frac{1}{2} \int_0^t \exp(B_s-s) \cdot \left(-\frac{1}{2} B_s^2+2B_s + \frac{s}{2} \right) \, ds$$

share|cite|improve this answer
I don't follow your first part unfortunately. The second part is what I got aswell though, I just omitted the 'ds'-part because as I first interpreted his answer he was just looking at the dB part from the Itôs formula. In a similar question he did the following: G is in this case: $G(w) = B^2_T(w) exp(B_T(w))$ from which you get that $E[G] = e^{T/2}(T + T^2)$, then you should do this representation of $G(w)$ as before. His solution to this is as follows: – Good guy Mike Dec 10 '12 at 15:18
"Use the Martingale Representation Theorem to get $G(w) = z + \int \psi(s,w)dB_s$ where z = E[G]. Now to get $\psi$, we apply the Itô formula to $B^2_t e^{B_t}$: to identify (as is done in several previous exercises) $\psi$. We get $\psi(s,w) = 2e^{B_t}B_t + B_t^2 e^{B_t}$." So that's why I thought we only cared about the dB-term in the Ito-formula. – Good guy Mike Dec 10 '12 at 15:18
If you compare the 5th line below (where he wrote $X_T=\ldots$) and the last one ($G_T=\ldots$), you see that he claims $2 \int_0^T B_t \cdot \exp \left(B_t - \frac{t}{2} \right) \, dt = T^2$. And I wanted to show that this cannot be true. (By the representation theorem there exists some $\psi$ such that $G=z+\int \psi \, dB$, but I think his one is not the correct one). – saz Dec 10 '12 at 16:55
Ok, now I see what you've done. He's taken the expectation in between though. So $E[2 \int_0^T B_t \cdot \exp \left( B_t-\frac{t}{2} \right) \, dt] = 2 \int_0^T E[B_t \cdot \exp \left( B_t-\frac{t}{2} \right)] \, dt = 2 \int_0^T E^Q[B^Q_t + t] \, dt = 2 \int_0^T t \, dt = T^2$. So this is true. The question is now why he did that. – Good guy Mike Dec 10 '12 at 17:26
The point is: He has a decomposition $X_T = Z+\int \ldots \, dB_s$ where $Z$ is some random variable ($Z$ is not a constant!). And now he takes the expectation of $Z$ and claims $X_T = \mathbb{E}Z+ \int \ldots \, dB_s$. But that's not true in general! – saz Dec 10 '12 at 17:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.