Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose that we have $a=p_1 \cdot p_2\cdot p_3=q_1\cdot q_2\cdots q_s$ where $p_1,p_2,p_3$ and $q_1,q_2,...,q_s$ are primes. Explain why $s=3$.

This seems like a pointless question, but is it $3$ because $p_n$ doesn't go past $p_3$?


I'm still having a hard time with this question. I'm mainly not understanding what it is asking.

share|improve this question
    
Please check to see that I didn't alter the intended meaning with my edit. –  Cameron Buie Dec 10 '12 at 2:10
    
Yes, there was an edit that changed the meaning. –  Dmitri.Mendeleev Dec 10 '12 at 2:13
    
Aha! Now it makes sense. –  MJD Dec 10 '12 at 2:14
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I don't think this question is posed correctly, because it's definitely not true: $$30=2\cdot3\cdot5=13+17\Rightarrow s=2$$ and $$42=2\cdot3\cdot7=5+7+13+17\Rightarrow s=4$$ are just two counterexamples.

For the corrected post: We want to show that if $a=p_1p_2p_3=q_1q_2\dots q_s$, then $s=3$. Clearly, $a$ divides $p_1$, so by the theorem on prime division, one of the $q_i$ divides $p_1$. Since $q_i$ is prime, then, $q_i=p_1$ and we can cancel it to get $p_2p_3=r_1r_2\dots r_{s-1}$ with $r_i$ prime. Repeating this process (assuming $s\geq 3$), we get $1=r_1r_2\dots r_{s-3}$, and all of the $r_i$ are integers, so either $s-3=0$ or $|r_i|=1$. But $r_i\geq 2$, so $s=3$. If $s<3$, then we will instead end up as $p_2p_3=1$ or similar. In this case, $p_i>1$ implies a contradiction. Thus $s=3$ is the only possible conclusion.

share|improve this answer
2  
Please see corrected post. –  amWhy Dec 10 '12 at 2:15
add comment

I might be wrong, but isn't this just an application of the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic (FTA)? This theorem states that for any given positive integer, there is only one way to express it as a product of primes. The solution of the problem is then obvious. Of course, for a more complete solution you would have to first prove the FTA, but I won't go into that here..

share|improve this answer
add comment

If you're worried that the question seems pointless, notice that the corresponding claim for addition is not true, since:

$$p_1 + p_2 + p_3 = q_1 + \cdots + q_s$$

does not require that $s=3$—for example, $$10 + 11 + 12 = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 18.$$

Even for multiplication the claim is not true unless you require the $p$s and $q$s to be prime:

$$20 \cdot 25 \cdot 30 = 2 \cdot 10\cdot 15 \cdot 50$$

So this claim depends in a crucial way on special properties of multiplication and of prime numbers, and that is why it is not a silly question.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.