Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am supposed to use the definition of the exponential function to prove that if x is a real number and the modulus of x is less than 1, the modulus of exp(x)-1 is less than or equal to (e-1)*modulus of x, and hence prove that the exponential function is sequentially continuous. I've managed to prove the former using the exponential power series but I don't understand how to 'hence' prove the latter.

share|cite|improve this question
What is your definition of "sequentially continuous"? – Pedro Tamaroff Dec 8 '12 at 23:44
@Peter Tamaroff If the sequence x_n converges to x_0, then f(x_n) will tend to f(x_0) as n tends to infinity. – Mathlete Dec 8 '12 at 23:48

You can prove this in several ways:

$(1)$ The exponential function is continuous. A function is continuous at ($x=x_0$) $\iff$ it is sequentially continuous (at $x=x_0$), thus the result follows.

$(2)$ The exponential function is differentiable over $\Bbb R$. Given a convergent sequence $\{a_n\}$, the sequence will be bounded over some interval $[a,b]$. Then we will have

$$|\exp(x_n)-\exp(x_0)|=\exp(\chi)|x_m-x_0|<M|x_m-x_0|$$ by the mean value theorem where $M$ is the maximum of $\exp$ (which is $ =\exp'$) over $[a,b]$.

Note that the exponential function has the superb property that being continuous at $x=0$ immediately means it is continuous at every other real. This is because of the functional equation $$\exp(x+y)=\exp(x)\exp(y)$$

Indeed, making $$\exp(x+h)-\exp(x)$$ small accounts to making $$\exp(x)(\exp(h)-1)$$

small. This can happen if $\exp(h)\to 1 $ when $h\to 0$ which is indeed true and means $\exp(h)=\exp(0)=1$ whence $\exp(h)$ is continuous at $x=0$. Thus, all you need is to show, as you're being asked, is that the exponential function is continuous at $x=0$, which means that if $|h|$ is small, so is $|e^h-1|$. My way would be to argue that since

$$1=\log e=\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{e^h-1}{h}$$ then

$$\lim_{h\to 0}]({e^h-1})=\lim_{h\to 0}h\frac{e^h-1}{h}=0\cdot 1=0$$ and continuity follows.

share|cite|improve this answer
I don't think the second method is the route I'm supposed to take and as for the first, I know that but I have to prove it? – Mathlete Dec 9 '12 at 0:03
I'm afraid I still don't understand. How exactly have you proven sequential continuity? – Mathlete Dec 9 '12 at 0:07

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.