Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Show that the Cantor set, C, is totally disconnected.

Let $x,y\in C$ and suppose (WLOG) that $x<y$. Since $x,y\in C$, then $x,y\in C_n$ $\forall n\in$ℕ . Then, by construction of C, $\exists$ N$\in$ℕsuch that $|x-y|>\frac{1}{3^N}$ (where $\frac{1}{3^N}$ is the length of a closed interval in $C_N$. This implies that $x$ and $y$ belong to different closed intervals in $C_N$ and also, there must exist an element, $z$, where $x<z<y$, but $z\notin C_N$ and hence, $z\notin C$ (i.e. $z$ was in the open interval "removed" when constructing the Cantor set). Let $A$={$a|a<z, a\in C$} and $B$={$b|b>z, b\in C$}. Then $x\in A$ and $y\in B$. Note that $\bar A\cup B$=$\emptyset$ and $A\cup \bar B$=$\emptyset$, implying that $A$ and $B$ are separated sets. Then, since $A$ is the set of all elements in $C$ less than $z$ and $B$ is the set of all elements in $C$ greater than $z$ (and $z$ is not in $C$), it follows that $C=A\cup B$, and therefore $C$ is totally disconnected.

Is this correctly done? I am concerned about the part where I stated that $A$ and $B$ are separated sets, do I need to prove this point further? Feedback is appreciated.

Thanks.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I think that it’s acceptable as is, except that you have a typo: you wrote $\overline A\cup B$ and $A\cup\overline B$ where you wanted intersections. However, it’s possible to give more justification quite easily, so you might want to do so. Just note that $A=C\cap(\leftarrow,z)$, so $A$ is open in $C$, and $A=C\cap(\leftarrow,z]$, so $A$ is closed in $C$, and $A=C\cap(\leftarrow,z)$, so $A$ is also open in $C$ and therefore $B=C\setminus A$ is closed in $C$. Thus, $\operatorname{cl}_CA=A$ and $\operatorname{cl}_CB=B$, and $\operatorname{cl}_CA\cap\operatorname{cl}_C=A\cap B=\varnothing$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you. Oh yes, I will be sure to correct it. In the 3rd line, do you mean A closure when you said A is closed? Does the cl in the last line mean "closure"? –  Alti Dec 8 '12 at 13:11
    
@Alti: No, I mean that $A$ itself is closed: it’s the intersection of $C$ with the closed set $(\leftarrow,z]$. And yes, $\operatorname{cl}XA$ is a standard notation for the closure of a set $A$ in a space $X$. –  Brian M. Scott Dec 8 '12 at 14:44
    
I'm sorry, I don't see how $z$ is included in the set $A$ because my definition of $A$ implies that $z$ is in not $A$... –  Alti Dec 8 '12 at 21:00
1  
@Alti: $z$ isn’t in $A$; that’s the whole point! That’s why $A=C\cap(\leftarrow,z)=C\cap(\leftarrow,z]$ is both open and closed in $C$. –  Brian M. Scott Dec 8 '12 at 22:09
    
Ohh okay, I wasn't thinking correctly, thank you for the help/clarification. –  Alti Dec 8 '12 at 23:45

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.