Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How do I go about doing this? I know that the definition of a quotient group is that it is the set of left cosets (aH) equipped with the following opeation:

$$ (aH)(bH) = (ab)H $$

Where the identity is $(1_G \cdot H) = H$.

How do I construct the group from here though? Or is this all the question is asking?

share|improve this question
    
I'd erase that second question about orbit, which isn't related at all to the first one, and would open a second thread for it. –  DonAntonio Dec 7 '12 at 17:06

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

You need to make (state) the connection between the hypothesis that $H\unlhd G$ and the conclusion that your $H/G$ is indeed a quotient group.

$$(aH)(bH) = (ab)H, \;\text {where the identity is}\;\; (1_G \cdot H) = H$$

You've got the pieces; you just need to connect them and verify that you do have a quotient group.

That is, simply verify that $(aH)(bH) = abH$ is well-defined, and that the operation defines a "group structure", to show that it is indeed a group.

This is easily established using the premise that $H\unlhd G$. For any old subgroup $H$ of $G$, it does not necessarily hold that $(aH)(bH) = abH,\;\; a, b \in G.\;\;$ It holds iff $H\unlhd G.$

Note: If you haven't learned that left coset multiplication on a subgroup $H$ is well defined if and only if $H$ is a normal subgroup of a group $G$, you should prove that. And if you haven't learned that the left (right) cosets of a normal subgroup $H$ of $G$ form a group $G/H$, then you need to prove that as well.

share|improve this answer
    
Is that all I would say for the proof then? –  Kaish Dec 7 '12 at 17:40
1  
Yes, given that $H\unlhd G$, you know that $aHbH = abH$, which satisfies one requirement of a quotient group. Likewise, you know that $(1_G\cdot H = H)$. Hence, G/H is your desired quotient group! –  amWhy Dec 7 '12 at 17:42

That's is, you've constructed it! Now prove

(1) the operation is well defined, meaning

$$aH=a'H\,\,,\,\,\,bH=b'H\Longrightarrow (ab)H=(a'b')H$$

and

(2) the operation actually gives you a group structure on the set of (left or right, it doesn't matter) cosets of H.

share|improve this answer
    
Is this important for the OP that he should care about the operation in abelian and non-abelian groups? I mean $aH$ and $a+H$. –  Babak S. Dec 7 '12 at 17:08
    
Do I need to prove it if they're just asking for the construction? –  Kaish Dec 7 '12 at 17:19
    
@Kaish, I think you must do that. –  DonAntonio Dec 7 '12 at 17:31
    
@Babak, I don't think so. That'll come later. –  DonAntonio Dec 7 '12 at 17:31
    
@Thanks, Don. Yes, it comes later. –  Babak S. Dec 7 '12 at 17:45

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.