Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $b, L \in \Bbb R$. Prove that if $b \ge L - \varepsilon$ for all positive $\varepsilon$, then $b \ge L$

I started of by assuming the "if" part. But, are you supposed to use cases to prove this? Is there an epsilon you can pick? Not sure what the approach should be here.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Suppose $b\geq L-\epsilon$ for all $\epsilon>0$.

If on the contrary $b<L$, we may set $\epsilon=\frac{L-b}{2}>0$. Then $L-\epsilon=L-\frac{L-b}{2}=\frac{L+b}{2}>b$, a contradiction.

share|cite|improve this answer
So, do you mean use the contrapositive of the statement to prove it? – Tejen Shrestha Dec 7 '12 at 0:43
Using the contradiction method, it's still a little unclear to me. So I substituted $\frac{L-b}{2}$ for $\epsilon$, which gives me $b \ge \frac{L-b}{2}$. But, I can't seem to wrap my around the reason this becomes a contradiction. – Tejen Shrestha Dec 7 '12 at 1:26
@JasperLoy - If you solve the (L+b)/2>b, you end up with L>b, which is what you assumed originally and not a contradiction – devcoder Dec 7 '12 at 1:37
@JasperLoy It makes sense now since we assumed that $b \ge L - \epsilon$ and $b \lt L$. Thank you! – Tejen Shrestha Dec 7 '12 at 1:46
I've run out of answers to upvote :( – amWhy Dec 30 '12 at 0:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.