Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a linear operator $\Phi$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and have created another operator that I believe to be its adjoint (transpose) $\Phi^T$.

What is the most direct way to verify that my $\Phi^T$ is indeed correct without having access to the matrix representation of $\Phi$ or $\Phi^T$?

share|cite|improve this question

Compute $(\Phi x, y)$ and $(x, \Phi^T y)$, they should be the same.

share|cite|improve this answer
    
Oops, I mean not classical, just regular adjoint---just the direct transpose. – Steve Dec 7 '12 at 0:24
    
I'm not sure what you mean. You're dealing with a real vector space so adjoint and transpose are the same. – Travis Dec 7 '12 at 18:56

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.