Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\alpha$ be a differential $k$-form on an orientable smooth $n$-dimensional manifold. If $\alpha\wedge\beta = 0$ for every differential $(n - k)$-form $\beta$, then $\alpha = 0$ because we can choose a Riemannian metric from which we can construct the corresponding Hodge dual $\ast$ and obtain $0 = \alpha\wedge\ast\alpha = \|\alpha\|^2dV$.

Can we deduce that $\alpha = 0$ without choosing a metric and considering the Hodge dual?

share|improve this question
3  
If you allow wedging with $0$-forms, this is trivial: wedge with a constant function. If you do not, this becomes false for $n$-forms (assuming you are on an $n$-dimensional manifold), again for trivial reasons. I think you need to put bounds on the degrees of $\alpha$ and $\beta$. –  Aaron Dec 6 '12 at 14:50
    
@Aaron: Of course you are right, I have changed my question accordingly. –  Michael Albanese Dec 8 '12 at 7:26

2 Answers 2

up vote 7 down vote accepted

This is pointwise. Choose a basis of the 1-forms $\omega_1, \ldots, \omega_n.$ Let $I$ denote any subset of $\{1,2,\ldots,n \}$ containing $k$ elements. then let $$ \omega_I = \omega_{i_1} \wedge \cdots \wedge \omega_{i_k}. $$ Meanwhile, let $I'$ denote the subset consisting of the other $n-k$ indices, that is $$ I \cap I' = \{ \}, \; \; I \cup I' = \{1,2,\ldots,n \}. $$ Why not, let $$ \Omega = \omega_{1} \wedge \cdots \wedge \omega_{n}. $$ We get $$ \omega_I \wedge \omega_{I'} = \pm \Omega, $$ but if $I \neq J,$ then $I \cap J' \neq \{ \},$ and so $$ I \neq J \Longrightarrow \omega_I \wedge \omega_{J'} = 0. $$

Your $\alpha$ is a $k$-form, so $$ \alpha = \sum_{I} a_I \omega_I $$ with real numbers $a_I.$ As result, given any fixed $J,$ we are just picking out the $J$ coefficient with $$ \alpha \wedge \omega_{J'} = \; \pm \, a_{J} \; \Omega. $$ Your hypothesis that any $(n-k)$ form $\beta$ gives $\alpha \wedge \beta = 0$ can be applied with $\beta = \omega_{J'}.$ So the conclusion is that all the coefficients $a_J =0$ and $\alpha = 0.$

share|improve this answer

I see, you did not specify 1-forms. Let me type this in, perhaps you can decide the status of the argument for other $p$-forms.

This is Cartan's Lemma, which is about 1-forms. On a smooth manifold (or small open neighborhood in one) of dimension $n,$ let $p \leq n.$ Let $\omega_1, \ldots, \omega_p$ be 1-forms that are (pointwise) linearly independent. Then let t $\theta_1, \ldots, \theta_p$ be 1-forms such that $$ \sum_{i=1}^p \theta_i \wedge \omega_i = 0. $$ Then there are smooth functions $A_{ij} = A_{ji}$ such that $$ \forall i \leq p, \; \; \; \theta_i = \sum_{j=1}^p A_{ij} \omega_j \; \; . $$

So, extend your 1-form $\alpha$ to a full basis $\omega_1, \ldots, \omega_{n-1}, \omega_n = \alpha.$ You are saying all wedges are zero, so $$ \sum_{i=1}^{n-1} \alpha \wedge \omega_i = 0. $$ Then $$ \alpha = \sum_{j=1}^{n-1} A_{ij} \omega_j \; \; . $$ However, $\omega_n = \alpha$ is part of the basis, which is contradicted, so this contradicts the ability to form such a basis and the assumption that $\alpha \neq 0.$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.