Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $k$ be a field whose characteristic is zero and let $n\geq 1$. Say that a matrix $M\in {\cal M}_{n\times n}(k)$ is almost orthogonal if $M^{T}M$ is a nonzero multiple of the identity. Denote the set of those matrices by $AO_n(k)$.

When $n=2$, there is a nice parametric description of $AO_2(k)$ :

$$ AO_2(k)=\Bigg\lbrace \bigg(\begin{matrix} a & b \\ -b&a \end{matrix}\bigg) \Bigg| (a,b) \in k^2, (a,b)\neq (0,0) \Bigg\rbrace $$

Are there similar exhaustive formulas with polynomial entries for $n>2$ ?

share|cite|improve this question
I think you expect more than just: $\Bigg\lbrace \bigg(\begin{matrix}1&0&0\\0& a & b \\0& -b&a \end{matrix}\bigg) \Bigg| (a,b) \in k^2 \Bigg\rbrace $. What does $k^2$ mean? Your field squared? – draks ... Dec 6 '12 at 11:20
@draks: $k^2$ is standard notation for $k\times k$. Your set clearly doesn't contain all of $AO_3(k)$. – joriki Dec 6 '12 at 11:26
@joriki thanks and I know. It was just meant as an example... – draks ... Dec 6 '12 at 11:30
@Ewan: This doesn't quite work out for $n=2$. If you exclude the zero multiple, you'd have to exclude $(a,b)=(0,0)$. If you don't, then $AO_2(\mathbb F_2)$ also contains e.g. $\pmatrix{1&0\\1&0}$. – joriki Dec 6 '12 at 11:39
I have provided a parametrization of $SO(n)$ in here… . – Przemo Oct 10 '14 at 11:56
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let's talk about $SO(n)$ instead. You do this as well implicitely, since the determinant of the matrix you have written is $a^2 + b^2 \geq 0$, so that this obviously can't parametrize even $O(2)$ which also has a component with negative determinant. The full parametrization would be two copies of $AO_2(k)$ glued along the surface of zero determinant (if you allow the multiple of the identity to be zero in your definition).

Now, this is purely a consequence of low dimension. $SO(2)$ is a circle and if you allow $M^TM$ be a multiple of identity then you also allow each matrix from $SO(2)$ to be multiplied by any number, so that you obtain a line bundle over $SO(2)$ surface and this is more or less just polar parametrization of the plane that the $SO(2)$ lies in. In higher dimensions, you similarly obtain a line bundle over $SO(n)$. But since $SO(n)$, $n>2$ is a much more complicated surface (as a subspace of the space of all matrices) than a simple circle, you can't expect anything nice here for big $n$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Also note the troubles regarding the joriki's comment above. So you probably want the multiple of the identity to be nonzero to exclude the zero determinant surface. – Marek Dec 6 '12 at 12:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.