Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've read in several places that defining $0^0=1$ is convenient in several (primarily discrete) settings. One argument on Wikipedia in favor of this definition was the need of a special case for the product rule $\frac{d}{dx} x^n = nx^{n-1}$ for $n=1$ at $x=0$.

Regardless of which definition, if any, is proper, is this not an argument to the contrary? Or I'm missing something? $nx^{n-1}$ for $n=1$ at $x=0$ is $1*0^0 = 1*1 = 1$ contradicts $\frac{d}{dx} 0^1 = \frac{d}{dx} 0 = 0$.

I feel as though there's something just incredibly obvious I'm missing here. How can this be an argument in favor of defining $0^0=1$?

share|improve this question
2  
Also, IMO it's far better to think of defining a discrete exponentiation operation which is separate from the ordinary real exponentiation operation, than thinking of extending the real exponentiation operator to have a value at $0^0$. –  Hurkyl Dec 6 '12 at 6:31
1  
Look at the pithy responses here (especially how the mathematician replies): askamathematician.com/2010/12/… –  Amzoti Dec 6 '12 at 6:32
    
Sorry, revised the power rule. The problem is still the same, though. Isn't this a problem for $0^0=1$? –  William Stagner Dec 6 '12 at 6:38
8  
The value of $\frac{d}{dx} f(x)$ at $x=a$ is not $\frac{d}{dx} f(a)$. –  Hurkyl Dec 6 '12 at 6:40
    
You're absolutely right. I feel embarrassed now... Thank you! –  William Stagner Dec 6 '12 at 6:45

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

There is actually a fairly good motivation for this definition, but it requires set theory, and a bit of torturing of definitions.

In set theory, given two sets $X,Y$, the set $X^Y$ is defined to be the set of all maps from $Y$ to $X$. Let $|X|$ be the cardinality ("size") of $X$ as usual. Then $|X^Y|$ = $|X|^{|Y|}$ if $|X|$ and $|Y|$ are positive integers. But if $|X|=|Y|=0$, so $X$ and $Y$ are both empty sets $\emptyset$, then there is one map; from the empty $Y$ to the empty $X$! In other words, $|\emptyset^\emptyset|=|\emptyset|^{|\emptyset|}=0^0=1$.

Now in order for this motivation to work fully, to have to declare that only the empty set can map to the empty set. Then $|X^\emptyset|=1$ for all $X$, because there is only the one map from $\emptyset$ to $\emptyset\in X$. Further, $|\emptyset^Y|=0$ if $Y\ne\emptyset$, because then there is no empty set to map from.

Like I said, a bit of torture, but it works!

share|improve this answer

Review the summary discussion on this topic here: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Zero.html

Things tend to get messy at times!

Regards -A

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.