Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If: \begin{align} Y&=h(z,\theta)+\epsilon\\ \theta&\sim \text{Unknown Distribution}\\ \epsilon &\sim N(0,\sigma^2) \end{align} My book states: $$ f_{y|(\theta,\sigma)}=f_{\epsilon|\theta,\sigma}(y-h(z,\theta)|\theta,\sigma ) $$ I don't follow why.

(This is in context of something like Bayesian Regression).

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

$\epsilon \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$, so $y|\theta,\sigma = h(z,\theta) + \epsilon \sim N(h(z,\theta),\sigma^2)$.

The equation says that the density $f_{y|\theta,\sigma}$ at the point $y^*$ is precisely the same as the density $f_{\epsilon|\theta,\sigma}$ at the point $y^* - h(z,\theta)$. This is true because $f_{y|\theta,\sigma}$ is just a shifted version of $f_{\epsilon|\theta,\sigma}$. Does that make sense?

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.