Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

We have $\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+x^2}} = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} P_n(0)x^n$ where $P_n(x)$ is a Legendre polynomial of degree $n$. Is there something similar for two dimensions i.e. $\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+x^2+y^2}}$ ?

share|cite|improve this question
There is another way to generalize the Legendre polynomials. The Legendre polynomials can be got by an expansion of the Newtonian potential in three dimensions. This expansion can be generalized to higher dimensions and the resulting polynomials are the Gegenbauer polynomials. – user26872 Dec 5 '12 at 22:44
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The formula given in your question generalizes to $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-2xz+ x^2}} = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} P_n(z)x^n $$ for $|x| < 1$. Hence by setting $y^2 = -2xz$ $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+ x^2 + y^2}} = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0} P_n\left(\frac{-y^2}{2x} \right)x^n \, . $$

share|cite|improve this answer
Shouldn't it be $|z|<1$ according to your notation (according to ? Besides I have $x,y \in \mathbb{R}$ and I would expect the solution to work for higher dimensions too... – user49546 Dec 5 '12 at 18:01
Convergence requires $|x| < 1$, not $|z| < 1$, according to the NIST handbook (which may well have been the source of the Wikipedia article). What do you mean by higher dimensions? Higher-dim Legendre polynomials? It's easy to see that your formula implies $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + x^2 + y^2}} = \sum_{n \ge 0} P_{2n}(0) (x^2 + y^2)^n$$ but I don't think that's what you have in mind. – Hans Engler Dec 5 '12 at 18:35
Evaluating at dimension n would be $\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\sum_{k=0}^n x_k^2}}$ In which case I would have $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\sum_{k=0}^n x_k^2}} = \sum_j P_{2j}(0)\left(\sum_{k=0}^n x_k^2\right)^j$$ is that correct ? – user49546 Dec 5 '12 at 20:38
Correct. It's just the original statement, written out in polar coordinates, if you will. – Hans Engler Dec 5 '12 at 21:07

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.