Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

$A-B-C$ means that there is a function $f$ on the line containing $A,B,C$ such that $f(A)<f(B)<f(C)$. I think this is called the betweenness axiom in some geometry books.

My professor said that we need to show there is another function on the line containing $A,B,C$ that maps $A,B,C$ to a codomain such that $f(C) < f(B) < f(A)$. I'm kind of confused, can I just define that other function to be whatever I want? It seems like making the function $g(x) = -x$ would accomplish that. Am I allowed to just that function however I want?

share|cite|improve this question

It depends on what kind of functions $f\colon\{A,B,C\}\to X$ you allow. From your usage of the symbol $<$, I infer that $X$ is in fact a (totally?) ordered set. If in additon to that $X$ happens to be a totally ordered abelian group, and the subset of allowed functions $\{A,B,C\}\to X$ carries enough structure (e.g. as subgroup of te abelian group $X^{\{A,B,C\}}$), then your idea of simply letting $g(x)=-f(x)$ is fine.

Alternatively, if $X$ is just some ordered set and you are allowed to switch (sufficietly arbitrarily) the codomain of your functions, then just replacing $X$ with $X^{\operatorname{op}}$ would be ok as well (where $X^{\operatorname{op}}$ is the set $X$ with order reversed, i.e. $a<^{\operatorname{op}}b\iff b<a$).

share|cite|improve this answer

There must be some information missing from the question, because as stated, the condition doesn't really tell us anything about the relation between $A$, $B$, and $C$. If you pick any random $A$, $B$, and $C$, as long as they are all different, you can define the function $f$ by: $$ f(p) = \begin{cases} 0 &\text{if }p=A \\ 1 &\text{if }p=B \\ 2 &\text{for all other }p\end{cases}$$ and this $f$ will then prove "$A-B-C$".

This clearly doesn't succeed in defining any kind of "betweenness", so I suspect there are additional conditions on $f$ that you haven't mentioned in the question -- for example something like "$f(p)$ must be an affine function of the coordinates of $p$".

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.