Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a question about the use of infinity and geometric sets. Say I am trying to graph an equation, and the result is all values greater than or equal to, say, $3$. From what I've seen, the proper way to write this is $(\infty, 3]$, where $3$ is included, as expected, but infinity isn't. Why?

I realize $\infty$ is obviously infinite, and therefore this is hard to imagine, but wouldn't $\infty$ then be included. Otherwise, it seems like the value would NOT include $\infty$.

I can kind of understand, as $\infty-x$ is still infinity. But therefore, should infinity ALWAYS be included? This is a real head-scractcher.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The "half-open" interval you want is $[3, +\infty)$ to denote all values greater than or equal to $3$ : $\{x \in \mathbb{R}, x \geq 3\}$.

You can think of the "open" part of the notation indicating that $+ \infty$ (like $-\infty$) has "no bound".

share|improve this answer
    
Ah, thanks. That makes a lot more sense. –  Josiah Dec 5 '12 at 15:53
    
@AceLegend Yeah, that's how I first made sense of the notation! –  amWhy Dec 5 '12 at 15:54

$-\infty$ and $+\infty$ are not real numbers. By writing for example $(0,+\infty)$ we are referring to all real numbers greater than $0$. In the extended real number system which is the set of all real numbers with $-\infty$ and $+\infty$ adjoined, we have $-\infty<x<+\infty$ for any real number $x$. This explains the use of the interval notation. If we wrote $(0,+\infty]$ instead we would be including $+\infty$ in our set.

share|improve this answer
    
Hmm. I still don't quite understand. I understand that they aren't real numbers, but why does that mean that they can't be included. I guess my real question here is why $\infty$ can't be included. –  Josiah Dec 5 '12 at 15:47
    
Otherwise, it seems like we are saying all values greater than or equal to 3, but less than $\infty$. –  Josiah Dec 5 '12 at 15:47
    
Really? Well, alright then. I guess that would make sense. –  Josiah Dec 5 '12 at 15:52
    
If you talk about a set including $\infty$ it certainly is no subset of $\mathbb R$. One can talk about extensions of $\mathbb R$ that do include $+\infty$ and $-\infty$ (or in fact just a single signless $\infty$), but be awre that one no longer talks about a subset of a complete ordered field. –  Hagen von Eitzen Dec 5 '12 at 16:00
    
@JasperLoy, I was being sarcastic. Didn't really come out like that though. Either way, I appreciate the answer. Unfortunately, I am not so experienced in mathematics as yourself. Therefore, I could not really make out what your answer was saying. I was not aware that because infinity wasn't in the geometric set that it could not be included. However, amWhy cleared it up for me. –  Josiah Dec 5 '12 at 16:07

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.