Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Q: If $f$ is Riemann integrable over $[0,1]$, then there exists a differentiable function $F$ on $[a, b]$ such that $F'=f$ and $\int_a^b f(x)dx = F(b)-F(a)$.

Here's what I'm thinking so far:

  • If $\alpha = x$, then you can say that $f$ is also Riemann-Stieltjes integrable on $[0,1]$.
  • Then, since $f$ must be a bounded real-valued function due to being Riemann integrable, we can use the theorem that states "For $0\le x \le 1$, put $F(x) = \int_0^x f(t) dt$. Then $f$ is continuous on $[0,1]$
  • In order for $F$ to be differentiable, $f$ must be continuous on $[0,1]$, so we add that as an assumption
  • Then, by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, we can say $\int_0^1 f(x) \; dx = F(1) - F(0)$.

I realize there are lots of issues here, but I'm hoping I'm at least on the right track. Any direction or hints are appreciated.

share|improve this question
In order for $F$ to be differentiable, $F$ should be continuous, not $f$. Otherwise, Riemann integrable would imply continuous (by your argument), and it clearly doesn't. –  Javier Badia Dec 5 '12 at 13:19
I agree that Riemann integrable does not imply continuous, but I'm having trouble making this leap. It seems like there will have to be some other requirement on f in order to guarantee such an F exists. I guess I'm thinking f needs to be continuous since its derivative needs to be F. –  GradStudent Dec 5 '12 at 13:22
What are you trying to do? The answer to the question is "no" (take any function with a jump discontinuity). Do you wish to find additional conditions on $f$ that would give an affirmative answer to the modified question? –  David Mitra Dec 5 '12 at 13:30
I am trying to either prove the statement, or give a counterexample. I am thinking I need a counterexample at this point, but am having trouble writing one. –  GradStudent Dec 5 '12 at 13:36

3 Answers 3

up vote 0 down vote accepted

The question is clearly false. Suppose it were true, and let $f = x$ on $[0,1]$. Let $g = f$ on $[0,1)$ and $g(1) = 0$. Then we have that $\int_a^bf(x) dx = \int_a^b g(x) dx$, since the functions differ at only a finite number of points. So your requirement would necessitate a differentiable function $F$ satisfying $0 = F'(1) = 1$.

share|improve this answer
Why does my requirement necessitate that F satisfies 0 = F'(1) = 1? –  GradStudent Dec 5 '12 at 16:27

Your question has a negative answer. For instance the function defined by $f(x)=\cases{-1,& $-1\le x<0$ \cr 1,&$ 0\le x\le 1$}$ is Riemann integrable over $[-1,1]$, but is not the derivative of any function (since derivatives have the intermediate value property as a result of Darboux's Theorem).

share|improve this answer
The Darboux Theorem you mentioned is not something we have covered in class, so I am not sure how else to show that f(x) is not the derivative of something. –  GradStudent Dec 5 '12 at 16:25
@GradStudent: Darboux's Theorem is the underlying conceptual reason behind counterexamples like this, but it's certainly not needed to check the lack of differentiability in this case. The antiderivative of a piecewise constant jump function like this is a piecewise linear function with a corner point. The left and right hand derivatives at this point are different, so the function is not differentiable. –  Pete L. Clark Dec 16 '13 at 21:50

Note that, A bounded function $f$ of $[a,b]$ is Riemann integrable on $[a,b]$ iff the function is continuous almost everywhere. This is known as Lebesgue's criteria.

share|improve this answer
@downvoter: what's the downvote for? –  Mhenni Benghorbal Dec 16 '13 at 10:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.