Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm trying to derive the matrix of a rigid transform to map between two coordinate spaces. I have the origin and the axis directions of the target coordinate space in terms of the known coordinate space; does anyone know how I can solve for the 4x4 rigid transformation matrix given these?

So, in other words, I have two coordinate spaces, A and B, and I know

Point3D originOfBInA;
Vector3D xAxisOfBInA; // Unit vector
Vector3D yAxisOfBInA; // Unit vector
Vector3D zAxisOfBInA; // Unit vector

And I'm trying to find the 4x4 matrix $\quad$

Matrix4x4 AtoB;
share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

Let $e_1, e_2, e_3$ be a basis of coordinate space $A$. Express your given vectors (xAxisOfBInA, etc..) in terms of the basis of A, lets label them as column vectors $v_1, v_2, v_3$.

Then coordinate transform matrix is $C = \pmatrix{v_1 & |& v_2 &|& v_3}$. But since you are shifting the origin, you are doing a 3D affine transform, which can be represented as a 4D linear transform.

Represent coordinates $(x,y,z) \in A$ as $\vec{x} = (x,y,z,1)$. Then the representation of $\vec{x}$ in $B$ is $D\vec{x}$, where $D = \pmatrix{C & x_0 \\ 0 & 1}$, where $x_0$ is the representation of originOfBInA in terms of the basis of $A$.

If this is too abstract, I can work out an example if you'd like.

share|improve this answer
    
Actually, hold on now, I'm not sure I follow. I understand the change of basis transform C , but the translation component of the affine transform I'm not sure I follow. If $x_0$ is the representation of the origin in B in terms of the basis of A, then $Dx_0 = \vec{0}$, or $Cx_0 + t = \vec{0}$, so $t = -Cx_0$. Doesn't this mean that $D = \pmatrix{C & -Cx_0 \\ 0 & 1}$? –  anjruu Dec 6 '12 at 19:21
    
Look at it this way. Let $\vec{X} = (x,y,z,1)$ and $\vec{x} = (x,y,z)$. Then, $D\vec{X} = C\vec{x} + x_0$ if you remove the extra $1$ coordinate after calculation is done. It looks like what you're saying is that $x_0$ is the origin of A and the zero vector is the origin of B. My statement is mapping the zero vector in A to the origin $x_0$ of B. Does that help at all? –  Stuart Dec 6 '12 at 20:03
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.