Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A stationary sequence $(X_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ exhibits long-range dependence if the autocovariance function $\rho(n):=\mathrm{cov}(X_k,X_{k+n})$ satisfy $$\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}{\rho(n) \over cn^{-\alpha}}=1$$ for some constant $c$ and $\alpha\in (0,1)$.

The increments of the fractional Brownian motion have the long-range dependence property for $H>{1\over2}$ since $$\rho_H(n)={1 \over2}\left[ (n+1)^{2H}+(n-1)^{2H}-2n^{2H}\right]\sim H(2H-1)n^{2H-2}$$ as $n$ goes to infinity.

I cannot follow why this relation holds. Can anybody help please?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

Using $\varepsilon=1/n\to0$, one sees that $$ \rho_H(n)=\tfrac12n^{2H}\left[(1+\varepsilon)^{2H}+(1-\varepsilon)^{2H}-2\right]. $$ Since $(1\pm\varepsilon)^{2H}=1\pm2H\varepsilon+H(2H-1)\varepsilon^2+o(\varepsilon^2)$, $$ \rho_H(n)=\tfrac12n^{2H}\left[1+2H\varepsilon+H(2H-1)\varepsilon^2+1-2H\varepsilon+H(2H-1)\varepsilon^2-2+o(\varepsilon^2)\right], $$ hence $$ \rho_H(n)\sim n^{2H}H(2H-1)\varepsilon^2=H(2H-1)n^{2H-2}. $$

share|improve this answer
    
Maybe it's gonna be a stupid question. I know I can ignore the term $o(\varepsilon^2)$ because it goes to zero as $n\to\infty$. But how can I explain that the term $2H(2H-1)\varepsilon^2$ doesn't disappear due to $\varepsilon^2\to 0$ as $n\to\infty$? –  Ichigo Dec 4 '12 at 15:35
    
The question is what happens to $n^{2H}\varepsilon^2$ and the answer is, this is $n^{2H-2}$ by definition of $\varepsilon$. –  Did Dec 4 '12 at 18:28

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.