Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X_t(\omega)$ be a continuous function $t\rightarrow L^p(\omega)$ (i.e., if we fixed the variable $t$ we obtain a function which belongs to $L^p$), with $t\in[0,T]$ and $\omega\in\mathbb{R}$.

I would like to know if this property of Lebesgue integrals:


is also valid for $L^p$-norm, i.e. if this is true:


Indeed, I have just proved that:

$||\int_0^TX_t(\omega)dt||_{L^p(\omega)}=(\int_\mathbb{R}(\int_0^TX_t(\omega)dt)^pd\omega)^\frac{1}{p}\leq(\int_0^T||X_t(\omega)||_{L^p(\omega)}^pdt)^\frac{1}{p}\cdot T^\frac{p-1}{p}$,

where I applied Hölder's inequality and Fubini's theorem.

Thank you for your attention.

share|cite|improve this question
Isn't this Minkowski's integral inequality? – Thomas Dec 4 '12 at 10:55
No, Minkowski is the extension of triangular inequality to $L^p$-norms. – Pippo Dec 4 '12 at 11:12
Minkowski's integral inequality:… – Thomas Dec 4 '12 at 11:20
I didn't know it existed this inequality... Sorry! – Pippo Dec 4 '12 at 11:57
up vote 1 down vote accepted

We have for each integer $N$ that $$\left\lVert\frac TN\sum_{j=1}^NX_{TkN^{-1}}(\cdot)\right\rVert_{L^p(\Omega)}\leqslant\frac TN\sum_{j=1}^N\left\lVert X_{TkN^{-1}}(\cdot)\right\rVert_{L^p(\Omega)}.$$ As $t\mapsto X_t(\cdot)$ and $t\mapsto \lVert X_t(\cdot)\rVert_{L^p(\Omega)}$, we conclude by a Riemann sum argument.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.