Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For quality control purposes we have to accept or reject a large shipment of items. In order to do so we collect a sample of 200 items, 24 of which are defective. The manufacturer claims that at most 1 in 10 items in a shipment are defective. At the 4% level of significance, is there significant evidence to disprove the claim?

Though exact answers are useful I am more of looking for how to do this. My current thinking is to find the standard normal deviation and find whether it is within the top 4%, which I believe is 1.75 deviations from 0.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

We are presumably using as null hypothesis that the probability $p$ of a defective is $1/10$, likely versus the alternative that $p\gt 1/10$.

The sample size of $200$ seems large enough, even with the relatively small $p$, to make the normal approximation good enough.

Assuming the null hypothesis, the standard deviation of the number of defectives in a sample of size $200$ is $\sqrt{(1/10)(9/10)(200)}$. This simplifies to $3\sqrt{2}$, about $4.24$.

On the null hypothesis, the mean number of defectives is $20$. Note that $24$ is therefore somewhat less than $1$ standard deviation unit above the mean. That is not far enough from the mean to reject the null hypothesis, at significance level $4\%$, or indeed any reasonable significance level.

And indeed, as you wrote, for any normal, the probability that we are more than $1.75$ standard deviation units above the mean is about $4\%$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.