Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The question is:

Solve the initial value problem:

$$\begin{align*} \frac{dx_1}{dt}&=40x_1-6x_2+18x_3,\\ \frac{dx_2}{dt}&=-6x_1+45x_2+12x_3,\\ \frac{dx_3}{dt}&=18x_1+12x_2+13x_3,\\ \end{align*} $$ with $$ \begin{align*} x_1(0) &= 3,\\ x_2(0) &= -4,\\ x_3(0) &= 12\\ \end{align*} $$

So my A matrix is:
$$A=\pmatrix{40&-6&18\cr-6&45&12\cr18&12&13\cr}$$ and to find the eigenvalues I find the determinant of this matrix:
$$A=\pmatrix{40-\lambda&-6&18\cr-6&45-\lambda&12\cr18&12&13-\lambda\cr}$$

which gives me these eigenvalues and vectors:
$\lambda _1=0 --- v_1=(-3,-2,6)$
$\lambda_{2,3}=49 --- v_2=(2,0,1)$ and $v_3=(-2,3,0)$

The place I'm having trouble is, from this question I know that the general solution for real eigenvalues is:
$$x=c_1e^{a_1t}v_1+c_2e^{a_2t}v_2+c_3e^{a_3t}v_3$$

but what would it be for repeated roots? Is it:
$$x=c_1e^{a_1t}v_1+c_2e^{a_2t}v_2+c_3te^{a_3t}v_3$$

share|improve this question
    
A simple answer: it depends. You seem to have two linearly independent eigenvectors for your eigenvalue of multiplicity 2 (I assume that your calculations are correct), which means that the general solution formula works. The last formula you wrote is generally wrong. –  Artem Dec 2 '12 at 22:06
    
Note that in this case $A$ is a real symmetric matrix, so it always has a basis of eigenvectors. –  Robert Israel Dec 2 '12 at 22:08

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Whenever $v$ is an eigenvector of $A$ for eigenvalue $\alpha$, $x = e^{\alpha t} v$ is a solution of $x' = A x$. Here you have three linearly independent eigenvectors, so three linearly independent solutions of that form, and so you can get the general solution as a linear combination of them. The fact that two of the eigenvalues are equal is irrelevant. The only case where you need solutions such as $t e^{\alpha t} v_1 + e^{\alpha t} v_2$ is where there is a "missing eigenvector": the eigenvalue $\alpha$ has geometric multiplicity less than its algebraic multiplicity.

share|improve this answer
    
well put, didn't get the geometric vs algebraic multiplicity but understood everything else, very informative. Thank you!! –  Richard Dec 2 '12 at 22:54
    
The algebraic multiplicity of eigenvalue $\alpha$ is the exponent of $z-\alpha$ in the factorization of the characteristic polynomial $\det(A-zI)$. The geometric multiplicity is the number of linearly independent eigenvectors of $\alpha$. If the geometric multiplicity is less than the algebraic multiplicity, you don't have enough eigenvectors to produce a general solution using the linear combinations of $e^{\alpha t} v$. –  Robert Israel Dec 3 '12 at 0:32

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.