Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

How can we show that the subgroup of $A_7$ generated by the permutations $x= (1234567)$ and $b=(26)(34)$ has order $168$?

share|improve this question
Welcome to math.SE: since you are new, I wanted to let you know a few things about the site. In order to get the best possible answers, it is helpful if you say in what context you encountered the problem, and what your thoughts on it are; this will prevent people from telling you things you already know, and help them give their answers at the right level. If this is homework, please add the homework tag; people will still help, so don't worry. –  Julian Kuelshammer Dec 2 '12 at 19:24
For some basic information about writing math at this site see e.g. here, here, here and here. –  Julian Kuelshammer Dec 2 '12 at 19:25
related: math.stackexchange.com/q/1401/152 –  Grigory M Dec 3 '12 at 9:24

2 Answers 2

Assuming you want to avoid using a computer, you could observe that your two permutations are both automorphisms of the projective plane with 7 points and lines $\{1,2,6\}$, $\{1,3,4\}$, $\{1,5,7\}$, $\{2,3,7\}$, $\{2,4,5\}$, $\{3,5,6\}$, $\{4,6,7\}$. That would give you an upper bound of 168 on the order.

To get a lower bound, you could note for example that $b$ has conjugates $(37)(45)$ and $(25)(67)$ under powers of $a$, and then try and show that these two permutations together with $b$ generate a subgroup of order at least 24 stabilizing 1.

share|improve this answer

For reference, this is Exercise 15 in Section 2.8 of Hungerford's graduate Algebra textbook. As such, there should be an answer that requires only the tools developed in the book up to that point. In particular, here is a proof that doesn't rely on knowledge of the projective plane.

Let $a=(1234567)$ and $b=(26)(34)$ and let $G = \langle a, b \rangle$. We want to show $|G|=168$. Because $|G|$ divides $7! / 2$, we must have $$|G| = 2^{m_2} 3^{m_3}5^{m_5}7^{m_7}$$ where $0 \le m_2 \le 3$, $0 \le m_3 \le 2$, $0 \le m_5 \le 1$, and $0 \le m_7 \le 1$.

Because $|a|=7$, we must have $7 \mid |G|$, and so $m_7=1$. Let $C_1 = \langle a\rangle$ and note that $C_1 \in Syl_7(G)$

Let us find $n_7$, the number of conjugates of $C_1$ in $G$. Observe \begin{equation*} b a b^{-1} = (1 6 4 3 5 2 7) \notin C_1, \end{equation*} giving the conjugate subgroup \begin{equation*} C_2 = \langle (1 6 4 3 5 2 7) \rangle = \langle (1 2 3 6 7 5 4) \rangle \ne C_1. \end{equation*} The group $G$ acts transitively on $Syl_7(G)$ by conjugation, and this induces a homomorphism $\varphi \colon G \to S_{n_7}$. Note $a C_2 a^{-1} \ne C_2$, and so $\varphi(a)$ is not trivial. Hence $|\varphi(a)|$ must be $7$. Because this is prime, $\varphi(a)$ must be a product of disjoint 7-cycles, one of which moves $C_2$. Thus the iteration $C_{i+1} = a C_i a^{-1}$ will give six more Sylow 7-subgroups $C_3, \dotsc, C_8$; of course, $a C_8 a^{-1} = C_2$ again. I leave these calculations to you. (You need only calculate generators. No need to list out all the elements of each subgroup, because because every elements is a power of the generator.) Becasue $|b|=2$, $\varphi(b)$ is a product of disjoint 2-cylces. We calculate $b C_3 b^{-1} = C_8$, $b C_4 b^{-1} = C_5$, and $b C_6 b^{-1} = C_7$; by definition we also had $b C_1 b^{-1} = C_2$. Because $a$ and $b$ generate $G$, this proves that the orbit of $C_1$ is $\{ C_1, \dotsc, C_8\}$. But the action of $G$ on $Syl_7 (G)$ is transitive, and so $Syl_7(G) = \{C_1, \dotsc, C_8\}$. Therefore $n_7=8$. But $n_7 \mid |G|$ by the Third Sylow Theorem, and so $m_2 = 3$.

Next observe that the Sylow 3-subgroups of $A_7$ are all of the form $\langle \sigma_1, \sigma_2 \rangle$ where $\sigma_1, \sigma_2$ are disjoint 3-cycles. Now, \begin{equation*} a b = (1 2 7)(3 5 6) \in \langle (127), (356) \rangle\in Syl_3 (A_7). \end{equation*} Becasue $|ab|=3$, we must have $m_3 \ge 1$. Suppose for contradiction that $m_3 = 2$. Then $ab$ would have to be contained in some Sylow 3-subgroup of $G$, but the only group of order 9 in $A_7$ containing $ab$ is $ \langle {(127), (356)} \rangle$. Thus $(127) \in G$. If we conjugate $a$ by $(127)$, the result $(1273456)$ must lie in $G$. Because that is not among the elements of $C_1, \dotsc, C_8$ calculated above, we have a contradiction. Thus $m_3 =1$.

Finally, suppose for contradiction that $m_5=1$. From our results so far we can conclude $[A_7 : G]=6$. But $A_7$ is simple, so that $A_7$ must be isomorphic to a subgroup of $S_6$ (by considering the action of $A_7$ on the left cosets of $G$). But this is impossible becasue $S_6$ has no elements of order 7. Thus $m_5 \ne 1$, and so $m_5 = 0$.

Therefore $|G| = 2^3 \cdot 3^1 \cdot 5^0 \cdot 7^1 = 168$.

share|improve this answer
After establishing that there are eight 7-Sylows, you could shorten your proof by observing that they are self-centralizing in $S_7$. As Aut($C_7$)=$C_6$ you get that $|G|=8 |N_G(C_7)|$ divides $8×7×6$. With mentioning that $ab$ has order 3, you are done. –  j.p. 2 days ago
@j.p. thank you! –  TBrendle 2 days ago

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.