# Is it correct to say that a sigma-algebra is generated by a collection of sets or a collection random variables ??

This really is a conceptual question. As I have come across articles saying that sigma-algebra is generated by collection of sets and articles that say sigma-algebra is generated by a collection of random variables .

I know they mean the same thing but I would like to know how would connect the 2 ideas together . Anyone knows?

-

The σ-algebra generated by a collection of sets is the smallest σ-algebra containing all the given sets.

The σ-algebra generated by a collection $\mathcal F$ of functions is the smallest σ-algebra so that all those functions are measurable with respect to that σ-algebra. Equivalently, it is the σ-algebra generated by the collections of sets on the form $f^{-1}(-\infty,x]$ where $f\in\mathcal F$ and $x\in\mathbb{R}$. And that is the connection you are looking for.

-
I assume you are aware that a random variable is just a measurable function on a probability space. I chose to use the slightly more general terminology in my answer; hope it did not confuse. –  Harald Hanche-Olsen Dec 1 '12 at 18:50
how would you call the form f^(-1) (-infinity, x] you mentioned up there??? Is there a particular name to it? –  user1769197 Dec 1 '12 at 19:09
It is called the inverse image. More generally, $f^{-1}(A)=\{x\colon f(x)\in A\}$. –  Harald Hanche-Olsen Dec 1 '12 at 19:29