Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why is $3 \cdot 3^k = 3^{k+1}$ and not $9^k\;$?

I'm aware that $3 = 3^1$ but I would expect $3\cdot 3^k\;$ to be $\;9^k$ or $\;9^{k+1}$.

share|cite|improve this question
Try $k=2$ and see whether it's enlightening. – Daan Michiels Nov 30 '12 at 16:34
What's the difference between $3\cdot 3^k$ and $(3\cdot 3)^k$? – Neal Nov 30 '12 at 16:35
General fact about mathematics: Nothing Is True, I repeat, Nothing Is True. Unless there’s a reason for it to be true. If you see an appealing-looking formula, your impulse should be to say, “that’s not true”, and then try some numbers to see whether perchance they fit the proposed formula. In particular, $3\cdot3^2=3\cdot3\cdot3=27$, in the case $k=2$, but $9^2=9\cdot9=3\cdot3\cdot3\cdot3=81$. Appealing or no, the formula is false. – Lubin Nov 30 '12 at 19:57
up vote 16 down vote accepted

$$3\cdot 3^k = 3\cdot\underbrace{3\cdot 3 \cdot \cdots 3 \cdot 3}_{k\;factors \;of \;3}$$ $$= \underbrace{3\cdot 3 \cdot \cdots 3 \cdot 3}_{k+1\;factors \;of \;3}$$ $$= 3^{k+1}$$

By convention, taking powers (exponentiation) precedes multiplication, and so it is performed first (before multiplication). That is, think of $\;3\cdot 3^k\;$ as expressing $\;3(3^k) = 3^{k+1}$.

If multiplication is to precede exponentiation, one would need to use parentheses to indicate "multiply first, then take the exponent of that product": $(3\cdot 3)^k = 9^k$.

$$\text{But}\;\; 3\cdot (3^k) \neq (3\cdot 3)^k$$ $$3^{k+1} \neq 9^k \text{ unless k = 1}. $$

If you really like the number $9$ and really want to use it in expressing $3\cdot3^k$, then note that $$3\cdot 3^k = 3\cdot\underbrace{3\cdot 3 \cdot \cdots 3 \cdot 3}_{k \;factors \;of \;3} = 9\cdot 3^{k-1} = 3\cdot 3 \cdot \underbrace{3\cdot 3 \cdot \cdots 3 \cdot 3}_{(k-1) \;factors \;of \;3}$$

share|cite|improve this answer

The answer is as follows: Because there's a convention that powers have larger priority than multiplication, therefore $$ 3\cdot 3^k = 3\cdot(3^k) \qquad\text{ and not }\qquad 3\cdot 3 ^k = (3\cdot 3)^k.$$

The question is similar to asking why $3+4\cdot 5=3+20=23$ and not $3+4\cdot5=7\cdot5=35$.

share|cite|improve this answer

From my point of view, The Answer is: It just does not follow law of indices, and nothing more

share|cite|improve this answer

We have $a^b\cdot a^c=a^{b+c}$. Look at this: $$\underbrace{a\cdot a\cdots \cdot a}_{b\text{ factors}}\cdot \underbrace{a\cdot a\cdots \cdot a}_{c\text{ factors}}=\underbrace{a\cdot a\cdots \cdot a}_{b+c\text{ factors}}$$

share|cite|improve this answer

By convention $\rm\: a\cdot b^{\,n}\:$ means $\rm\:a \cdot (b^n)\:$ not $\rm\:(a\cdot b)^n.\:$ If we adopted the alternative convention, then many common arithmetical expressions (e.g. polynomials) would require more symbols to notate.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.