Why is $3 \cdot 3^k = 3^{k+1}$ and not $9^k\;$?
I'm aware that $3 = 3^1$ but I would expect $3\cdot 3^k\;$ to be $\;9^k$ or $\;9^{k+1}$.
|
Why is $3 \cdot 3^k = 3^{k+1}$ and not $9^k\;$? I'm aware that $3 = 3^1$ but I would expect $3\cdot 3^k\;$ to be $\;9^k$ or $\;9^{k+1}$. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
$$3\cdot 3^k = 3\cdot\underbrace{3\cdot 3 \cdot \cdots 3 \cdot 3}_{k\;factors \;of \;3}$$ $$= \underbrace{3\cdot 3 \cdot \cdots 3 \cdot 3}_{k+1\;factors \;of \;3}$$ $$= 3^{k+1}$$ By convention, taking powers (exponentiation) precedes multiplication, and so it is performed first (before multiplication). That is, think of $\;3\cdot 3^k\;$ as expressing $\;3(3^k) = 3^{k+1}$. If multiplication is to precede exponentiation, one would need to use parentheses to indicate "multiply first, then take the exponent of that product": $(3\cdot 3)^k = 9^k$. $$\text{But}\;\; 3\cdot (3^k) \neq (3\cdot 3)^k$$ $$3^{k+1} \neq 9^k \text{ unless k = 1}. $$ If you really like the number $9$ and really want to use it in expressing $3\cdot3^k$, then note that $$3\cdot 3^k = 3\cdot\underbrace{3\cdot 3 \cdot \cdots 3 \cdot 3}_{k \;factors \;of \;3} = 9\cdot 3^{k-1} = 3\cdot 3 \cdot \underbrace{3\cdot 3 \cdot \cdots 3 \cdot 3}_{(k-1) \;factors \;of \;3}$$ |
||||
|
|
|
The answer is as follows: Because there's a convention that powers have larger priority than multiplication, therefore $$ 3\cdot 3^k = 3\cdot(3^k) \qquad\text{ and not }\qquad 3\cdot 3 ^k = (3\cdot 3)^k.$$ The question is similar to asking why $3+4\cdot 5=3+20=23$ and not $3+4\cdot5=7\cdot5=35$. |
|||
|
|
|
From my point of view, The Answer is: It just does not follow law of indices, and nothing more |
|||
|
|
|
We have $a^b\cdot a^c=a^{b+c}$. Look at this: $$\underbrace{a\cdot a\cdots \cdot a}_{b\text{ factors}}\cdot \underbrace{a\cdot a\cdots \cdot a}_{c\text{ factors}}=\underbrace{a\cdot a\cdots \cdot a}_{b+c\text{ factors}}$$ |
|||
|
|
|
The left-hand side of your equation involves two operations, multiplication and raising to a power. The agreed-upon convention for such expressions is to perform the exponentiation first (we assign it a higher precedence) and then do the multiplication. Using parentheses to force this operation we'd have, for $k=2$, for example $$ 3\cdot3^2=3\cdot(3^2)=3\cdot(9)=27 $$ Doing the multiplication first we'd have $$ 3\cdot3^2=(3\cdot3)^2=(9)^2=81 $$ Mathematicians could have agreed that the order would be "multiplication first, and then exponentiation", but they didn't: absent parentheses, exponentiation (and other functions like $\log,\sin$ and negation) are performed first, then any multiplications and divisions are performed, and finally any additions and subtractions. |
|||
|
|
|
By convention $\rm\: a\cdot b^{\,n}\:$ means $\rm\:a \cdot (b^n)\:$ not $\rm\:(a\cdot b)^n.\:$ If we adopted the alternative convention, then many common arithmetical expressions (e.g. polynomials) would require more symbols to notate. |
|||
|
|