Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I believe that it is true that if we have a group $G$, and two copies $H_1$, $H_2$ of some group $H$ as subgroups of $G$, we can fix a representation $V$ of $H$ and have the situation:

$$\operatorname{Ind}_{H_{1}} V \ncong \operatorname{Ind}_{H_{2}} V$$

I believe my example is Klein-4 in $S_4$, you can take a normal copy generated by products of disjoint $2$-cycles $(12)(34)$, etc., and a copy $\{ (12)(34),(12),(34), 1 \}$ (or do $\mathbb{Z}_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_3$ in $S_9$ )

Anyway, if $H_1$ and $H_2$ are conjugate subgroups, then the induced representations will be isomorphic as can be seen by the character formula

$ 1/|H| \sum_{x} V(x^{-1}gx) $ = character of $\operatorname{Ind}_{H_{1}} V $ = character of $\operatorname{Ind}_{H_{2}} V$

Is this correct? Thank you

share|improve this question
    
So you're looking at the case of ordinary representations? –  Curufin Nov 30 '12 at 14:15

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Yes, if $H_{1}$ and $H_{2}$ are conjugate, you will get isomorphic modules (whihever ring you work over). If $H_{1}$ and $H_{2}$ are not conjugate, then you need not get the same character for the induced module, even in the complex case. The example you gave for $S_{4}$ is perfectly valid- if $H_{1}$ is normal, then the induced character will vanish outside $H_{1},$ while if $H_{2}$ is not normal, that need not be the case (it is not in your example).

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for the answer, it is what I thought. I wanted to ask here for a "fact-checking", in case I did something wrong in my proof. The reason why I picked those two versions of klein-4 is that one is normal and the other isn't ( when you unpack the character formula, all the terms in the normal case will remain, while the terms in the non-normal case will be 0, when conjugation sends you outside the subgroup ). –  Elliot Nov 30 '12 at 15:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.