Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be a compact metric space, $\mathcal{B}(X)$ be the borel-sigma algebra.

Assume $\mu(G)>0$ for all nonempty open sets $G\subseteq X$.

Show that for each open set $G$, exists a closed subset $F\subset G$ of positive measure and a continuous function $f$ defined as $f(x)=1$ for $x\in F$, $f(x)>0$ for $x\in G$ and $f(x)=0$ for $x\in X\setminus G$.

Is there any reason why a function like $g(x)=\frac{d(x,X\setminus G)}{d(x,X\setminus G)+d(x,G)}$

wouldn't work? The only problem i got with it...that $g(x)=1$ for all $x\in G$. But it seems to work. I'm not sure what to show here. I feel somehow it's not the function im supposed to coock up :P

share|improve this question
1  
If $G$ is not clopen and therefore has a non-empty boundary, $g(x)$ is undefined for every point in the boundary of $G$, because both terms in the denominator are $0$. –  Brian M. Scott Nov 30 '12 at 13:12
1  
What, if anything, does the measure have to do with the question? –  Chris Eagle Nov 30 '12 at 13:14
    
That refers to Urysohn's functions, check e.g. here –  S.D. Nov 30 '12 at 13:16
    
i edited the question, $F\subset G$ must be closed and of positive measure. Its all ive been given :P –  DinkyDoe Nov 30 '12 at 13:16
    
oh, S.D that looks interesting. I take a look :) –  DinkyDoe Nov 30 '12 at 13:21
show 1 more comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

If $G$ is empty, this is clearly impossible.

So suppose $G$ is nonempty. Let $x \in G$. Since $G$ is open, there exists $r$ such that the open ball of radius $r$ around $x$ is contained in $G$. Let $F$ be the closed ball of radius $r/2$ around $x$. It's certainly closed, and it has positive measure since it contains a nonempty open set.

Now let $f(x)=\frac{d(x,X\setminus G)}{d(x,X\setminus G)+d(x,F)}$.

share|improve this answer
    
sorry, i edited the question. you asked what has the measure to do with it. Well this...$F$ must be of positive measure. Otherwise u can take $F$ empty. –  DinkyDoe Nov 30 '12 at 13:19
    
ah so, that's close to what i had in mind. Very nice :) –  DinkyDoe Nov 30 '12 at 13:25
    
Another question...what does the -1 mean in the question. Do people dislike the question? :P –  DinkyDoe Nov 30 '12 at 13:26
    
That should be a comment on the question, if anything. It has nothing to do with my answer. –  Chris Eagle Nov 30 '12 at 13:26
add comment

Every metric space is normal, so you know from the Tietze extension theorem that for any closed $F\subseteq G$ there is a continuous $f:X\to[0,1]$ such that $f(x)=1$ for $x\in F$ and $f(x)=0$ for $x\in X\setminus G$. To get $F$ to have positive measure, just pick a point $x\in G$, use the regularity of metric spaces to get an open nbhd $U$ of $x$ such that $\operatorname{cl}U\subseteq G$, and let $F=\operatorname{cl}U$.

It only remains to be shown that $f$ can be chosen in such a way that $f(x)=0$ iff $x\in X\setminus G$. (In technical terms, we need to show that $X\setminus G$ is a zero-set, also called a functionally closed set, or, equivalently, that $G$ is a cozero-set, also called a functionally open set.) You can show that $X\setminus G$ is a zero-set using the function $g(x)=d(x,X\setminus G)$. Now combine $f$ and $g$ suitably to get the desired function.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.