Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For a vector space $V$ and a linear operator $f : V \to V$, under what conditions does $V = \ker(f) \oplus \operatorname{im}(f)$?

Is it always true, or only in special cases?

Edit: $V$ is finite dimensional.

share|improve this question
1  
2  
It depends on whether you mean equality and the internal direct sum, or isomorphism and the external direct sum. Matt's comment applies to the latter case. –  joriki Nov 30 '12 at 8:23
1  
@joriki: Equality. I haven't heard the term internal direct sum before, but based on the definition on Wikipedia, I think that's what I'm referring to, since $\ker(f)$ and $\operatorname{im}(f)$ are subspaces of $V$. –  Red Nov 30 '12 at 8:30
3  
@joriki: Given that $\ker(f)$ and $\operatorname{im}(f)$ are subspaces of $V$ and that the question has "$=$" rather than "$\cong$" there should be no doubt that an internal direct sum is meant, and that "always" is wrong as an answer. –  Marc van Leeuwen Nov 30 '12 at 9:08
1  

4 Answers 4

up vote 3 down vote accepted

$\def\im{\operatorname{im}}$As from the rank-nullity theorem as Matt remarked we always have $$ \dim\ker f + \dim\im f = \dim V $$ the only thing that is missing in the finite-dimensional case, is $\ker f \cap \im f = 0$, that is $f|_{\im f}\colon \im f \to V$ has to be one-to-one.

This is sometimes true, for example for projections (that is idempotent) $f$ where you have $f^2 = f$, and hence a $y =f(x)\in \im f$ with $f(y) = 0$ has $$0 = f(y) = f^2(x) = f(x) = y.$$ Sometimes it is not true, consider for example $$ f = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0\end{pmatrix} \colon \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R^2 $$ Here you have $\ker f = \im f = \operatorname{span} e_1$, so $f|_{\im f} = 0$ is not one-to-one.

I'm not quite sure if something general can be said in the infinite-dimensional-case.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks! I was only concerned about the finite dimensional case anyway, I just forgot to mention it. –  Red Nov 30 '12 at 9:07

This is true if and only if $\dim\ker f$ equals the multiplicity of $0$ as (possible) eigenvalue of $f$, in other words if the geometric and algebraic multiplicites of this eigenvalue are equal.

One may assume the base field to be algebraically closed (so for instance interpret some matrix of $f$ as a complex matrix if the base field was $\mathbf R$), in which case one has an $f$-stable direct sum decomposition into generalised eigenspaces $E_\lambda$ for $f$, and we can consider the question separately on each subspace $E_\lambda$. For any $\lambda\neq0$, the restriction $f|_{E_\lambda}$ of $f$ to $E_\lambda$ is invertible, so $\ker(f|_{E_\lambda})=0$ and $\operatorname{im}(f|_{E_\lambda})=E_\lambda$, and we have $ E_\lambda=\ker(f|_{E_\lambda})\oplus \operatorname{im}(f|_{E_\lambda})$ trivially. However for $\lambda=0$ we have $E_0=\ker(f^k)$ for some $k\geq1$; if $E_0\supset \ker(f)$ strictly (so one cannot take $k=1$) then for $v\in E_0\setminus \ker(f)$ the last non-zero vector among $f(v)\neq0,f^2(v),\ldots,f^k(v)=0$ lies in $\ker(f)\cap \operatorname{im}(f)$ proving that the sum is not direct. So a necessary and sufficient condition for the sum to be direct is that $E_0=\ker(f)$. And $\dim E_0$ is the algebraic multiplicity of $\lambda=0$.

share|improve this answer

In Hilbert spaces (spaces with scalar product) you have that

$$\ker (B^*) = (\operatorname{ran} B)^\perp,$$

Where $\operatorname{ran}$ is the range, i.e., what you call image; the $B^*$ is the adjoint operator, defined by the prescription $$(Bx,y)=(x,B^*y);$$ and $U^\perp$ is the orthogonal complement to $U$, i.e. $$U^\perp=\{v:(\forall u\in U)((u,v)=0)\}.$$

There is a wide class of Hermitean operators, i.e. such that $B=B^*$. All these satisfy $\ker B = (\operatorname{ran} B)^\perp$ therefore $\ker B\oplus \operatorname{ran} B=V$.

In the finite-dimensional case, every Hermitean matrix (i.e., $a_{ij}=\overline{a_{ji}}$) satisfies this property.

share|improve this answer

Consider Jordan matrix form, what you need is that $W_0=V_0$ where $W_0$ is the generalized eigenspace for the eigenvalue $0$. So $f_{|_{W_0}}$ must be diagonalizable, that's it.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.