Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Find the the minimal distance from the point $P=(17, -19, 0)$ to the plane $V$ in $\Bbb R^3$ spanned by the vectors $u_1 = (4, -4, -2)$ and $u_2 = (-4, 1, 1)$.

So, I tried to apply the Best Approximation Theorem where the $\mathrm{dist}(P,W) = \| P - \mathrm{proj}_w P \|$ where $W = \mathrm{span} \{u_1, u_2\}$. But I realize that to apply the Best Approximation theorem $u_1$ and $u_2$ must be orthogonal and they are not.

So, to find an orthogonal basis for $W$ I used The Gram-Schmidt Process where I let $v_1 = u_1 =(4, -4, -2)$ and I obtained $v_2 = (-14/9, -13/9, -2/9)$. Hence, $\{v_1, v_2\}$ is an orthogonal set.

After this I tried to apply the Best Approximation Theorem to find the minimal distance but I still do not get the correct answer.

I hope my question makes sense.

share|cite|improve this question
Um, $u_1$ and $u_2$ don't need to be orthogonal. The distance between a point and a plane is always the norm of the difference between the point and its projection on the plane because the projection is the closest point in the plane to $P$. The way that the plane is defined doesn't change things at all, i.e. whether the basis chosen to define $W$ is orthonormal or not is irrelevant. – Patrick Da Silva Nov 29 '12 at 23:35
up vote 0 down vote accepted

You have $W = \mathrm{span}\{ (4,-4,-2), (-4,1,1) \}$. First, orthonormalize the basis of $W$ to find $\{v_1, v_2\}$ using the Gram-Schmidt algorithm. After this, an easy way to compute the projection on $W$ would be this : compute the projections of $P$ on $v_1$ and $v_2$ as follows : $$ \mathrm{proj}_{v_1}(P) = (P \cdot v_1)v_1 $$ and $$ \mathrm{proj}_{v_2}(P) = (P \cdot v_2)v_2 $$ Now that you have this, $$ \mathrm{proj}_{W}(P) = \mathrm{proj}_{v_1}(P) + \mathrm{proj}_{v_2}(P). $$ Therefore you can compute the norm of $P - \mathrm{proj}_{W}(P)$ and get the distance from $P$ to $W$. I leave the number crunching to you. If the number crunching went wrong I would need to see the numbers to help.

Note that your so-called "best approximation theorem" doesn't need the vectors $u_1$ and $u_2$ to be orthogonal. What requires orthogonality is the technique used to compute the projections, because you want to project $P$ on $v_1$ and $v_2$ and then add the individual projections. This does not work when $v_1$ and $v_2$ are not orthogonal (make yourself a little drawing if you want to be convinced, it's quite obvious).

Hope that helps,

share|cite|improve this answer
Okay. I understand now. Thank You for the explanation. – Diana Martinez Nov 29 '12 at 23:55

Employ double cross product u3 = u1 X (u1 X u2) in plane V to apply Best Approximation theorem.

share|cite|improve this answer
That's just a computationally convenient (maybe...) way to orthogonalize the set \{u_1, u_2\}$ into $\{u_1, u_3\}$, but to be honest I'd rather use Gram-Schmidt ; only one dot product involved. – Patrick Da Silva Nov 30 '12 at 4:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.