Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would like to ask if there is a simple way to prove the non-flatness of the above morphism of rings using just the definition of a flat module.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Consider the injection $(s,t) \rightarrow \mathbb{C}[s,t]$. Tensor with $\mathbb{C}[x,y]$ and notice that the result is not injective. Indeed, the natural map $(s,t) \otimes_{\mathbb{C}[s,t]}\mathbb{C}[x,y]\rightarrow \mathbb{C}[x,y]$ sends $s \otimes y$ and $t \otimes 1$ to the same place. It is easy to check that these are not the same element of the tensor product.

In general, if something is not flat then there is some finitely generated ideal $I \subset R$ that will witness this failure.

share|cite|improve this answer
Dylan, many thanks for your answer! – agleaner Nov 29 '12 at 14:13
In fact, I have one more question. How have you found out this proof, i.e. why did you chose $I=(s,t)$? What is the intuition? – agleaner Nov 29 '12 at 14:31
I knew there had to be some finitely-generated ideal that worked... and it sort of felt right that the equation $sy = t$ would be important for reasons that I don't know how to put in words... so I tried $(s,t)$, and it worked. – Dylan Wilson Nov 29 '12 at 17:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.