Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $f(x)=\frac{1}{x-3}$ on $(3,4]$. I need to show that f is continuous in this interval, but not uniformly continuous.

Idea: Since $f'(x)=\frac{-1}{(x-3)^{2}}$, the derivative exists at all points in $(3,4]$ then $f$ is continuous in $(3,4]$ But if we look at uniform continuity, $\lim_{x \to a^{+}}f(x)$ is infinity while $f(3)$ is simply undefined. Is this accurate to say? More worried about the second part.

share|cite|improve this question
For continuity, all you really need is that it is a rational function, and those are continuous wherever they are defined. – Francis Adams Nov 28 '12 at 3:38
The derivative exists at all points in (3,4], so as you note, $f$ is continuous there. But is the derivative $f'$ bounded on (3,4]? What is the implication for uniform continuity? – hardmath Nov 28 '12 at 3:40

To show that $f$ is not uniformly continuous:

Let $\varepsilon=1$. Consider two sequences $(x_n)=3+\frac{1}{n}$, $(y_n)=3+\frac{1}{n+2}$ which are contained in $(3,4]$ and $\lim x_n-y_n=0$, then for all $\delta>0$ exists $N$ such that $|x_n-y_n|<\delta$ for every $n > N$, but note that:

$$|f(x_n)-f(y_n)|=\left|\frac{1}{3+\frac{1}{n}-3}-\frac{1}{3+\frac{1}{n+2}-3}\right|=|n-(n+2)|=2 > \varepsilon $$

Therefore, $f$ is not uniformly continuous in $(3,4]$.

share|cite|improve this answer

It is not too hard to show that any uniformly continuous function defined on a bounded set has to be bounded, e.g. using sequences and the Bolzano Weierstrass theorem.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.