Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have been trying to solve the following problem:

The coefficient of $\lambda^{3}$ in the characteristic polynomial $f(\lambda)$ of \begin{pmatrix} 2 &3 &0 &1 \\ 4&-1 &0 &0 \\ 0&3 &-4 &8 \\ 2&1 &-4 &2 \end{pmatrix} is

(a) $2$
(b) $3$
(c) $0$
(d) $1$.

My question is: Is there any other way to find the coefficient of $\lambda^{3}$,apart from finding the characteristic polynomial of the given matrix? I have solved it by finding the characteristic polynomial which is lengthy. Any other alternative suggestions to tackle the problem in a better way will be appreciated. Thanks in advance for your time.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted


Lemma: For any square matrix $\,A\,$ of order $\,n\times n\,$ , the coefficient of $\,x^{n-1}\,$ in the characteristic polynomial of $\,A\,$ is the trace of $\,A\,\,\,,\,tr.(A)\,$, multipied by $\,(-1)^{n-1}$

share|cite|improve this answer

Finding the characteristic polynomial is probably the most direct way, though it can be admittedly tedious.

If you happened to know that the eigenvalues of the matrix are $\lambda_1,...,\lambda_4$ (not necessarily distinct, but with appropriate algebraic multiplicities), then the coefficient of $\lambda^3$ in the characteristic polynomial would be $-(\lambda_1+...+\lambda_4)$. (Why?) This, though, is simply the opposite of the trace of the matrix! (Why?) Certainly, that's the simplest way to find the desired coefficient, though you need more tools in your arsenal to be able to justify it, than if you just find the characteristic polynomial.

If you happen to know that this matrix is similar to some other, nicer matrix (diagonal, or upper/lower triangular, say) then you need only calculate the characteristic polynomial of the nicer matrix, since it will be the same as that of the matrix you're looking at. (Why?)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.