Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top


Will I be able to use partial fractions on the indefinite integral and then evaluate my answer as f(2)-f(0)?

Any help is appreciated as always. :)

EDIT: I looked this up and apparently the integral doesn't converge so now I need help finding where I went wrong.

I had solved for 1 = $\frac{A}{x+2} + \frac{B}{x-1}$

sub in x = 1 and $B=\frac{1}{3}$

sub in x=-2 and $A=\frac{-1}{3}$


$\frac{-1}{3}\int\frac{dx}{x+2} + \frac{1}{3}\int\frac{dx}{x-1}$

Simple u-substitution gives:

$\frac{-1}{3}ln|x+2|$ + $\frac{1}{3}ln|x-1| + C $

Which I was going to then evaluate f(2)-f(0) but somewhere I went wrong.

share|cite|improve this question
Given that you had the thought of partial fractions (a good one) you should try it and see what happens. – Ross Millikan Mar 2 '11 at 5:16
$\ln(x-1)$ is unbounded in the range of integration, which violates one of the assumptions of (that of continuity). – Ross Millikan Mar 2 '11 at 5:26
But I figured that it didn't matter since they are absolute values. Instead should I split up the result into two parts of a limit? Or should I do something else instead? – Finzz Mar 2 '11 at 5:30
Yes, you should split up the parts and take a limit. The point is that if you try to take the integral up to 1, then down from 1, they both go to to infinity. So you have $\infty - \infty$ which is not well defined. If you take a symmetric limit, you get the but to have a well-defined answer takes more. – Ross Millikan Mar 2 '11 at 5:48
EDIT: {Answered my own question} – Finzz Mar 2 '11 at 6:15
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Hint 1: $$\frac{1}{(x+2)(x-1)}=\frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{1}{x-1}-\frac{1}{x+2}\right)$$

Hint 2: Does this converge or diverge? Think about $$\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{1}{x}dx.$$ Does the value of this integral even make sense?

share|cite|improve this answer
No it doesn't you are right. But all we have learned in my class so far (this was a problem we were given, but it's not homework) is that the indefinite integral of 1/x is the natural log of the ABSOLUTE value of x. But I guess I can't use that here? – Finzz Mar 2 '11 at 5:36
@Finzz: From the definition of integration, (whichever one), the function $\frac{1}{x}$ doesn't behave nicely when we include an interval around zero. You cannot take $\infty$ and subtract $\infty$ to get zero. However, in some sense if we draw the function, it looks like the area under negative part should cancel with the positive part to get 0. In some sense we might think $\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{1}{x}dx=0$. This is a different notion, and is called the "Cauchy Principle Value" , but stick to "it diverges" for your calculus course. – Eric Naslund Mar 2 '11 at 5:44
Alright, thanks. – Finzz Mar 2 '11 at 5:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.