Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am given a sample from a spatial distribution $X$. For example, my variable $X$ is the number of certain diseases per city per capita. Null hypothesis is that variable $X$ does not depend on the location directly (it might be dependent on another spatial distribution which is known say the amount of mercury in the water or other forms of pollution $Y$). How can I test this null hypothesis for a spatially distributed variable? What happens if I have very few samples? Say, for variable $x_1$ I have several million measurements but for variable $x_2$ I have 100 measurements? In case if I do not know $Y$, but I have other variables which I know are uniformly distributed ($X_i$ depends upon $Y$, but does not depends on location directly) how can I test null hypothesis? How can my test see the difference between cases A) when $X$ is a function of not only $Y$ everywhere B) $X$ is function of only $Y$ in some subregions, say the USA but it depends on other factors somewhere else?

share|cite|improve this question

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.