Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is chapter $4$ exercise $25.b$ of Walter Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis, this problem has occupied my mind for a long time, and I haven't been able to solve it, I would like to see an answer to this question.

Thanks.

share|improve this question
    
Almost a duplicate of math.stackexchange.com/questions/73262/… –  lhf Nov 26 '12 at 22:48
    
You can use Dirichlet approximation theorem, which essentially follows from the pigeonhole principle, to prove that fact. –  sos440 Sep 5 '13 at 23:37

2 Answers 2

up vote 12 down vote accepted

Hint: Let $a_n$ be the fractional part of $n\alpha$. This is $n\alpha-\lfloor n\alpha\rfloor$.

Note that because $\alpha$ is irrational, the $a_n$ are all distinct.

Therefore for any $\epsilon\gt 0$, there exist distinct $m$ and $n$ such that $|a_m-a_n|\lt \epsilon$. (There is still some work to do.)

share|improve this answer
    
@Camilo This is a very good hint; perhaps what you are missing is the last part? The first two lines show you that there are infinitely many distinct numbers in $\alpha\Bbb{Z}+\Bbb{Z}$ that are within $(0,1)$. So surely some two such numbers are very close together. Once that is established, their difference is in the set too... And after that, all integer multiples of this difference... –  alex.jordan Dec 19 '12 at 4:24

Here's one relatively straightforward approach to it: By a simplified version of Hurwitz's theorem, there's are infinitely many rationals $m/n$ with $\left|\alpha-\dfrac{m}{n}\right|\leq \dfrac{1}{n^2}$; multiplying by $n$ we have $\left|n\alpha-m\right|\leq \dfrac{1}{n}$ - or, defining $\beta\equiv\left|n\alpha-m\right|$, $\beta\leq\dfrac{1}{n}$. Letting $q=\left\lfloor\dfrac{1}{\beta}\right\rfloor$, the $q$ numbers $\beta, 2\beta, \ldots, q\beta$ - each of which is of the form $a\alpha+b$ for some $a, b\in\mathbb{Z}$ - then provide a cover of $(0..1)$ to 'resolution' $\frac{1}{n}$; by translation we then get the density in $\mathbb{Z}$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.