Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

So it's easy to show that the rationals and the integers have the same size, using everyone's favorite spiral-around-the-grid.

Can the approach be extended to say that the set of complex numbers has the same cardinality as the reals?

share|improve this question
One can show that $|\mathbb R| = |\mathbb R^2| = |\mathbb C|$ –  Stefan Nov 26 '12 at 19:05
It's quite sad, but it's easier to write an answer than finding the duplicate. And I am sure this question has been asked before. –  Asaf Karagila Nov 26 '12 at 19:08
The best treatment of this in an existing answer is probably here. –  Brian M. Scott Nov 26 '12 at 19:31

4 Answers 4


$$|\mathbb R|=2^{\aleph_0}; |\mathbb C|=|\mathbb{R\times R}|=|\mathbb R|^2.$$

We have if so:

$$|\mathbb C|=|\mathbb R|^2 =(2^{\aleph_0})^2 = 2^{\aleph_0\cdot 2}=2^{\aleph_0}=|\mathbb R|$$

If one wishes to write down an explicit function, one can use a function of $\mathbb{N\times 2\to N}$, and combine it with a bijection between $2^\mathbb N$ and $\mathbb R$.

share|improve this answer

Of course. I will show it on numbers in $[0,1)$ and $[0,1)\times[0,1)$. Consider $z=x+iy$ with $x=0.x_1x_2x_3\ldots$ and $y=0.y_1y_2y_3\ldots$ their decimal expansions (the standard, greedy ones with no $9^\omega$ as a suffix). Then the number $f(z)=0.x_1y_1x_2y_2x_3y_3\ldots$ is real and this map is clearly injective on the above mentioned sets. Generalization to the whole $\mathbb C$ is straighforward. This gives $\#\mathbb C\leq\#\mathbb R$. the other way around is obvious.

share|improve this answer
This requires a bit more work. The map isn’t well-defined until you deal with the $0.4999\dots=0.5000\dots$ issue; if you deal with that straightforwardly, it’a nor surjective. –  Brian M. Scott Nov 26 '12 at 19:14
Yes, you are right. However, they all all (complex) rational hence of no interest for the sets of continuum cardinality. I'll add a comment. –  yo' Nov 26 '12 at 19:16
And btw, usually a string with suffix $9^\omega$ is not considered to be an expansion (it is only a representation), in the usual greedy expansions as defined by Rényi in 1957. –  yo' Nov 26 '12 at 19:22
I’ve never seen anyone make a distinction between representation and expansion, and I very much doubt that the distinction can be considered standard; certainly it does not qualify as well-known, so if you use it, you need to explain it. –  Brian M. Scott Nov 26 '12 at 19:29
And yes, I know that only countably many numbers are affected and that this does not affect the result, but I don’t know that the OP knows this. –  Brian M. Scott Nov 26 '12 at 19:33

Consult #4b in http://faculty.lasierra.edu/~jvanderw/classes/m415a03/hw8ans.pdf.

A straightforward bijection $B : \mathbb{R^2} \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ is: $B(a,b) = a + bi$. I omit the verification of injectivity and surjectivity. Then $|C| = |\mathbb{R^2}|$. The separate result that $|\mathbb{R^k}| = |\mathbb{R}| \; \forall \; k \in \mathbb{N}$ implies $|\mathbb{R^2}| = |\mathbb{R}|$. Altogether, $|C| = |\mathbb{R^2}| = |\mathbb{R}|$.

share|improve this answer

One particularly nice class of bijections from $\Bbb R$ to $\Bbb C = \Bbb R^2$, which is in my opinion a little bit similar to the spiral around the grid, is given by the space-filling curves.

share|improve this answer
This is incorrect. Space filling curves are not injective. –  Dan Rust Aug 8 '14 at 15:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.